2017
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is Actually Affected by the Scrambling of Objects When Localizing the Lateral Occipital Complex?

Abstract: The lateral occipital complex (LOC), the cortical region critical for shape perception, is localized with fMRI by its greater BOLD activity when viewing intact objects compared with their scrambled versions (resembling texture). Despite hundreds of studies investigating LOC, what the LOC localizer accomplishes-beyond distinguishing shape from texture-has never been resolved. By independently scattering the intact parts of objects, the axis structure defining the relations between parts was no longer defined. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The involvement of LO further supports the hypothesis that the processes involved in object recognition are involved in the perception of engravings. This hypothesis is consistent with the fact that LO has been proven to be sensitive to the shape, but not the semantics, of objects [48][49][50][51][52]. Concerning the ventral part of the LOC, includes in the fusiform gyrus, it has been shown that the left fusiform gyrus, which is involved in the visual processing of engravings, is sensitive to semantic information [53,54].…”
Section: Rationale and Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The involvement of LO further supports the hypothesis that the processes involved in object recognition are involved in the perception of engravings. This hypothesis is consistent with the fact that LO has been proven to be sensitive to the shape, but not the semantics, of objects [48][49][50][51][52]. Concerning the ventral part of the LOC, includes in the fusiform gyrus, it has been shown that the left fusiform gyrus, which is involved in the visual processing of engravings, is sensitive to semantic information [53,54].…”
Section: Rationale and Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The absence of a (stimulus-related) increase in VLOC activity in the dots and dots quadrant experiment seems incompatible with a study reporting enhanced LOC activity for intact compared to scattered objects with disturbed inter-part relations (Margalit et al, 2017). Yet, in this study, inter-part relations were abolished by disturbing the contiguity of different shape parts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…However, it is unclear whether the inverse relationship between the VLOC/LOC and lower visual cortex we and others quantified (Fang et al, 2008; Grassi et al, 2018; Murray et al, 2002) can be regarded as a generic perceptual grouping mechanism operating irrespective of shape perception. Recent evidence suggests, for instance, that activity in the LOC also decreases for intact vs scattered objects with abolished inter-part relations (Margalit et al, 2017) as it is the case during the no-diamond percept. In order to address this question, our third experiment used a non-ambiguous stimulus consisting of four circular apertures, each carrying a random dot kinematogram (RDK).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The involvement of this region further supports the hypothesis that the processes involved in object recognition are involved in the perception of EEAG. This hypothesis is consistent with the fact that LO has been proven to be sensitive to the shape, but not the semantics, of objects 22,23 . Thus, although the similarity between the profiles of the objects and EEAG does not demonstrate that EEAG were previously used as symbols, modern brains perceive these EEAG as coherent visual entities to which symbolic meaning can be attached.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%