2015
DOI: 10.1080/00856401.2015.1052896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is a Public? Notes from South Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The widespread criticism of this prescriptive model for its lack of empirical significance was taken up in Habermas's later proposal of the 'post-secular', which, however, fails to fully transcend the normative and liberal binaries inherent in his theory (see Casanova 2013;Cooke 2010). For South Asia, even more than elsewhere, it has been argued that many publics are structured both religiously and, more specifically, communally, for a number of historical and structural reasons, many of which are rooted in colonial policy (Embree 2002;Scott and Ingram 2015). They range from the partial intersection of language or print communities with religious affiliation 12 to legal pluralism and the significance of contested religious nationalisms that are partially a legacy of the divide-and-rule policy, including the two-state solution of the British colonial government.…”
Section: Secular Publics As Mediated Through Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread criticism of this prescriptive model for its lack of empirical significance was taken up in Habermas's later proposal of the 'post-secular', which, however, fails to fully transcend the normative and liberal binaries inherent in his theory (see Casanova 2013;Cooke 2010). For South Asia, even more than elsewhere, it has been argued that many publics are structured both religiously and, more specifically, communally, for a number of historical and structural reasons, many of which are rooted in colonial policy (Embree 2002;Scott and Ingram 2015). They range from the partial intersection of language or print communities with religious affiliation 12 to legal pluralism and the significance of contested religious nationalisms that are partially a legacy of the divide-and-rule policy, including the two-state solution of the British colonial government.…”
Section: Secular Publics As Mediated Through Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer questions about the changing nature of publics or privates requires us to recognize the polysemic nature of these terms and the multiple dimensions along which the distinction can be asserted. The interest in publics among South Asianist historians, inaugurated by the Habermasian debate, in fact concerns only one very particular kind of public, the public sphere, and it is this that the scholarship has focused on (Habermas 1991; Calhoun 1993; Scott, Ingram, and Tareen 2016). Understanding the governance of Dalits in the nineteenth century, however, requires us to examine several linked but distinct kinds of publicness.…”
Section: The ‘Public’ Sphere the ‘Private’ Home And Dalit Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%