What is a philosophical effect? Models of data in experimental philosophy

Huebner, Bryce

doi:10.1007/s11098-015-0469-2

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Over the past 15 years, experimental philosophy has witnessed a continuous and significant increase in attention, which is clearly demonstrated by the formation of research symposia and societies, alongside the production of special issues and collections. 4 Yet these recent trends in philosophical research have also prompted some discussions within the philosophical community, revolving around both the philosophical significance (e.g., Cappelen 2014 ; Nagel and Mortensen 2016 ) and the scientific soundness (e.g., Cullen 2010 ; Seyedsayamdost 2015a , b ; Strickland and Suben 2012 ; Huebner 2015 ) of experimental philosophy research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Issues for New Methods: Ethical and Editorial Challenges for an Experimental Philosophy

Polonioli

2016

Sci Eng Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines a constellation of ethical and editorial issues that have arisen since philosophers started to conduct, submit and publish empirical research. These issues encompass concerns over responsible authorship, fair treatment of human subjects, ethicality of experimental procedures, availability of data, unselective reporting and publishability of research findings. This study aims to assess whether the philosophical community has as yet successfully addressed such issues. To do so, the instructions for authors, submission process and published research papers of 29 main journals in philosophy have been considered and analyzed. In light of the evidence reported here, it is argued that the philosophical community has as yet failed to properly tackle such issues. The paper also delivers some recommendations for authors, reviewers and editors in the field.

show abstract