What is 3D good for? A review of human performance on stereoscopic 3D displays

McIntire, John P.; Havig, Paul R.; Geiselman, Eric E.

doi:10.1117/12.920017

Cited by 60 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 84 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, Broy et al found advantages in attractiveness for the stereoscopic variant compared to a monoscopic display in the automotive context [1]. An overview of other benefits of 3D displays are shown by McIntire [5]. The overall trend to increase the driving experience through novel display technology is also reflected by the fact that Mercedes recently deployed a 3D display in the F125 concept car.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Exploring virtual depth for automotive instrument cluster concepts

Broy

Zierer

Schneegaß

et al. 2014

CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper compares the user experience of three novel concept designs for 3D-based car dashboards. Our work is motivated by the fact that analogue dashboards are currently being replaced by their digital counterparts. At the same time, auto-stereoscopic displays enter the market, allowing the quality of novel dashboards to be increased, both with regard to the perceived quality and in supporting the driving task. Since no guidelines or principles exist for the design of digital 3D dashboards, we take an initial step in designing and evaluating such interfaces. In a study with 12 participants we were able to show that stereoscopic 3D increases the perceived quality of the display while motion parallax leads to a rather disturbing experience.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Exploring virtual depth for automotive instrument cluster concepts

Broy

Zierer

Schneegaß

et al. 2014

CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Human factors studies strongly support that the added complexity of 3D capability results in performance benefits in eighty-five percent of teleoperation experiments involving stereoscopic displays for spatial manipulation. 7 There is a vast amount of literature that surrounds several aspects of 3D capture, image processing, and displays. 8,9,10,11,12 In particular, there are several human factors topics, such as accommodation-vergence, that deal with 3D viewing comfort.…”

Section: Teleoperation Using 3d Remote Viewing Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

3D display considerations for rugged airborne environments

Barnidge

Tchon

2015

Display Technologies and Applications for Defense, Security, and Avionics IX; And Head- And Helmet-Mounted Displays XX

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The KC-46 is the next generation, multi-role, aerial refueling tanker aircraft being developed by Boeing for the United States Air Force. Rockwell Collins has developed the Remote Vision System (RVS) that supports aerial refueling operations under a variety of conditions. The system utilizes large-area, high-resolution 3D displays linked with remote sensors to enhance the operator's visual acuity for precise aerial refueling control. This paper reviews the design considerations, trade-offs, and other factors related to the selection and ruggedization of the 3D display technology for this military application.

show abstract

“…They found that users perceived 3D menus to be more visually pleasing, entertaining, innovative, and empowering but also to be more time-consuming and difficult to control. McIntire et al investigated human performance on stereoscopic 3D displays [17]. They found such displays to be particularly beneficial for depth-related tasks, such as judging distances or finding and identifying objects.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using eye-tracking to support interaction with layered 3D interfaces on stereoscopic displays

Alt¹,

Schneegaß

Auda

et al. 2014

Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we investigate the concept of gaze-based interaction with 3D user interfaces. We currently see stereo vision displays becoming ubiquitous, particularly as autostereoscopy enables the perception of 3D content without the use of glasses. As a result, application areas for 3D beyond entertainment in cinema or at home emerge, including work settings, mobile phones, public displays, and cars. At the same time, eye tracking is hitting the consumer market with low-cost devices. We envision eye trackers in the future to be integrated with consumer devices (laptops, mobile phones, displays), hence allowing the user's gaze to be analyzed and used as input for interactive applications. A particular challenge when applying this concept to 3D displays is that current eye trackers provide the gaze point in 2D only (x and y coordinates). In this paper, we compare the performance of two methods that use the eye's physiology for calculating the gaze point in 3D space, hence enabling gaze-based interaction with stereoscopic content. Furthermore, we provide a comparison of gaze interaction in 2D and 3D with regard to user experience and performance. Our results show that with current technology, eye tracking on stereoscopic displays is possible with similar performance as on standard 2D screens.

show abstract

What is 3D good for? A review of human performance on stereoscopic 3D displays

Cited by 60 publications

References 84 publications

Exploring virtual depth for automotive instrument cluster concepts

Exploring virtual depth for automotive instrument cluster concepts

3D display considerations for rugged airborne environments

Using eye-tracking to support interaction with layered 3D interfaces on stereoscopic displays

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About