2018
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/mwxye
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What increases (social) media attention: Research impact, author prominence or title attractiveness?

Abstract: Do only major scientific breakthroughs hit the news and social media, or does a 'catchy' title help to attract public attention? How strong is the connection between the importance of a scientific paper and the (social) media attention it receives? In this study we investigate these questions by analysing the relationship between the observed attention and certain characteristics of scientific papers from two major multidisciplinary journals: Nature Communication (NC) and Proceedings of the National Academy of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interesting subject for future research was exposed by our interviewees P6's and P7's hypothesis that certain types of metrics might give an advantage to certain types of publications. While work has been done to identify document properties that lead to increasing altmetric resonance (see e.g., Haustein et al, 2015;Zagovora et al, 2018), the properties examined usually refer to document type, -structure, or -meta data, and not to the publications' contents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting subject for future research was exposed by our interviewees P6's and P7's hypothesis that certain types of metrics might give an advantage to certain types of publications. While work has been done to identify document properties that lead to increasing altmetric resonance (see e.g., Haustein et al, 2015;Zagovora et al, 2018), the properties examined usually refer to document type, -structure, or -meta data, and not to the publications' contents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore next we ask: Can collaborations between individuals improve our ability to predict the magnitude of success and the occurrence of career big hits? Previous research suggests that scientific career success and network position can be connected [41,42,43,44,15,45].…”
Section: Lack Of Predictive Power Of the Collaboration Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rule explains the variability in the occurrence of creative individuals' best hit. Yet, career hits are not only the results of luck but also of other individual and team properties [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. While previous literature suggests that luck and individual ability are both necessary to excel in art and science charts [18,19,20,21,22], a quantification of the role of luck across different creative domains is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has demonstrated that the quality of this framing can have a substantial impact on how much the content gets shared on social media. 15 Fourth, blog editors are responsible for managing a website or, at the very least, managing the process by delegating the work to colleagues. Academic blogs commonly rely on commercial content management systems such as WordPress, but some blogs use bespoke website templates that make greater demands on the technical expertise of editors.…”
Section: Academic Blogging and The Role Of Blog Editorsmentioning
confidence: 99%