2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What impressions do users have after a ride in an automated shuttle? An interview study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(31 reference statements)
7
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have included items from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) constructs 'performance expectancy', 'effort expectancy', and 'social influence', which have been found to be predictive of the intention to use technologies across a variety of domains (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis, 2003). Additionally, we investigated the respondents' perceptions with regard to perceived safety, perceived enjoyment, desired level of control, and environmental attitudes, because these variables have been identified as potentially critical determinants of the acceptance of automated vehicles in previous studies (e.g., Gorris et al, 2011;Moták et al, 2017;Nordhoff, De Winter, Payre, Van Arem, & Happee, 2018). Finally, the present 68-item survey study includes information on respondents' ratings of the acceptance of automated shuttles, using Van der Laan, Heino, and De Waard's (1997) acceptance scale, in addition to other indicators of acceptance, including respondents' intended frequency to use, willingness to pay, and behavioral intention to use shuttles as feeders to public transport.…”
Section: Objectives Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have included items from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) constructs 'performance expectancy', 'effort expectancy', and 'social influence', which have been found to be predictive of the intention to use technologies across a variety of domains (Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis, 2003). Additionally, we investigated the respondents' perceptions with regard to perceived safety, perceived enjoyment, desired level of control, and environmental attitudes, because these variables have been identified as potentially critical determinants of the acceptance of automated vehicles in previous studies (e.g., Gorris et al, 2011;Moták et al, 2017;Nordhoff, De Winter, Payre, Van Arem, & Happee, 2018). Finally, the present 68-item survey study includes information on respondents' ratings of the acceptance of automated shuttles, using Van der Laan, Heino, and De Waard's (1997) acceptance scale, in addition to other indicators of acceptance, including respondents' intended frequency to use, willingness to pay, and behavioral intention to use shuttles as feeders to public transport.…”
Section: Objectives Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has used large national or cross-national samples via interviews or online questionnaires and asked them questions about imagined automated vehicles (see Eurobarometer method;European Commission, 2015Nordhoff et al, 2018). Although these studies target broad and potentially representative audiences, their results may be of limited validity, as the respondents had to respond based on their general beliefs (e.g., as obtained via the media or Internet sources).…”
Section: Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acceptability can be measured before the use (as an expectation), whereas the acceptance itself is to be measured after the use (as a revealed preference) [18]. Numerous publications deal with the measurement of expectations toward services based on AVs mostly by stated preference questionnaires [10,19] or in some cases by revealed preference questionnaires [20,21]. Measuring the acceptance is rather difficult as bare experience is available.…”
Section: Planning Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Az utasok részéről inkább pozitív, míg az adminisztratív és szabályozói oldalról inkább negatív fogadtatás figyelhető meg [21]. Mindazonáltal a jelenlegi tesztjellegű automatizált kisbuszos szolgáltatások jellemzői általában még nem felelnek meg a felhasználói elvárásoknak; többek között az alacsony utazási sebesség miatt [22].…”
Section: Szakirodalmi áTtekintésunclassified