What Imaging‐Detected Pathologies Are Associated With Shoulder Symptoms and Their Persistence? A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

ObjectiveShoulder symptoms are common, and imaging is being increasingly used to help with management. However, the relationship between imaging and symptoms remains unclear. This review aims to understand the relationship between imaging‐detected pathologies, symptoms, and their persistence.MethodsA systematic review using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and grey literature was conducted to April 2017. The cross‐sectional and longitudinal relationships between imaging‐detected abnormalities and symptoms were analyzed and associations qualitatively characterized by a best‐evidence synthesis based on study design, covariate adjustment, and the Grade of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Modalities included ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radiographs, positron emission tomography (PET), bone scintigraphy, and computed tomography.ResultsA total of 6,569 abstracts was screened and 56 articles were included. In total, 50 studies did not adjust for covariates and 36 analyzed individual pathologies only. The majority of studies showed conflicting results. There was no significant association between most imaging features and symptoms among high‐quality, cross‐sectional studies. There was low‐quality evidence that enhancement of the joint capsule on MRI and increased uptake on PET were associated with symptoms in adhesive capsulitis. Based on high‐quality longitudinal studies, enlarging rotator cuff tears were associated with an increased incidence of symptoms.ConclusionThere were conflicting results on the association of imaging features with shoulder symptoms and their persistence. The existing evidence was very low in quality, based on the GRADE methodology. Further high‐quality studies are required to understand the relationship between imaging and shoulder symptoms and to determine the appropriate role of imaging in care pathways.

How do people perceive different labels for rotator cuff disease? A content analysis of data collected in a randomised controlled experiment

“…4 Neither clinical features nor diagnostic imaging can reliably pinpoint a specific nociceptive cause of rotator cuff disease from the numerous candidate pain-sensitive structures in the shoulder (eg, tendon, bursa). [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Possibly as a result of such uncertainty, there are a plethora of diagnostic labels that have been used in both routine practice and research to indicate the same condition. 12 Some labels describe the clinical features (eg, painful arc syndrome), the Strengths and limitations of the study ► Our study used a large sample size and a highly reliable coding frameworks (k=0.90-0.97 across labelling groups for both questions).…”

No relationship between the acromiohumeral distance and pain in adults with subacromial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“…A recently published systematic review 33 found conflicting results regarding the association between imaging findings of the shoulder such as AHD and symptoms. This study only presented the results narratively, with no meta-analysis investigating the subacromial space differences between adults with SAPS and controls with no shoulder pain.…”

Strain Elastography and Tendon Response to an Exercise Program in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: An Exploratory Study

“…However, there is conflicting evidence about the correlation between imaging findings and pain in the shoulder because pathologies may also exist in asymptomatic individuals. 36 It is not assumed that changes in the chronic stage of tendinopathy are reversible, but exercise may optimize the function of the remaining healthy tendon structure including improved elasticity and thereby function of the tendon. Elasticity is not measurable using existing imaging modalities, such as conventional US.…”