2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12471-019-01317-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What if there is no prospective, double blind, randomised trial?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there was considerable overlap in patients in the image-guided VT ablation group, since four out of five studies (two from Barcelona, two from Bordeaux) were from the same cardiology centre and CMR data were available in only a subset of patients, with the remainder undergoing CT or echocardiography. For further determination as to whether image-guided VT ablation can be considered a superior approach compared to conventional VT ablation, a more stringent, randomised comparison of different strategies is needed [ 10 ]. Nevertheless, the authors should be commended for their informative and hypothesis-generating efforts to increase our understanding of strategies aimed at improving VT ablation therapies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there was considerable overlap in patients in the image-guided VT ablation group, since four out of five studies (two from Barcelona, two from Bordeaux) were from the same cardiology centre and CMR data were available in only a subset of patients, with the remainder undergoing CT or echocardiography. For further determination as to whether image-guided VT ablation can be considered a superior approach compared to conventional VT ablation, a more stringent, randomised comparison of different strategies is needed [ 10 ]. Nevertheless, the authors should be commended for their informative and hypothesis-generating efforts to increase our understanding of strategies aimed at improving VT ablation therapies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%