2016
DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2016.1176474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What If There Are No Conventional Price Mechanisms?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutionalists describe a central planning of the business sector as well as people's agency (Munkirs and Knoedler 1987;Dean 2015;Gagnon 2015;Figart 2017;Baranes and Hake 2018;Schneider 2021). Market central planning is to be distinguished from democratic planning by the public (Dugger 1987) and the ideology of the price mechanism (see Jo 2016). The social organization of markets through administered pricing, planned obsolescence, differentiation, jobs and work relations, among others, is the source of power to determine markups, prices, employment, worklife, inventories, products, and their availability (Lee 1996).…”
Section: Market Central Planning Workmanship and Confronting Stratifi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutionalists describe a central planning of the business sector as well as people's agency (Munkirs and Knoedler 1987;Dean 2015;Gagnon 2015;Figart 2017;Baranes and Hake 2018;Schneider 2021). Market central planning is to be distinguished from democratic planning by the public (Dugger 1987) and the ideology of the price mechanism (see Jo 2016). The social organization of markets through administered pricing, planned obsolescence, differentiation, jobs and work relations, among others, is the source of power to determine markups, prices, employment, worklife, inventories, products, and their availability (Lee 1996).…”
Section: Market Central Planning Workmanship and Confronting Stratifi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a summary of this controversy see Prasch (2007). See also Lee (1984) and Jo (2016). 16 For a more detailed discussion see Jo (2018).…”
Section: The Institutionalist Theory Of the Firm And Evolutionary Dynmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not the matter of modifying one or few of these core assumptions, but the matter of taking the entire framework or not. This means that an attempt to integrate ITBE with mainstream firm theories (including the new institutionalist theory) will do more harm than good for the the development of ITBE (Knoedler 1995;Jo 2016). However, it should not be inferred from the above argument that ITBE leaves nothing to be desired.…”
Section: Conclusion: a Look Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%