What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation

Abstract

BackgroundAdvanced Computerized Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) assist clinicians in their decision-making process, generating recommendations based on up-to-date scientific evidence. Although this technology has the potential to improve the quality of patient care, its mere provision does not guarantee uptake: even where CDSSs are available, clinicians often fail to adopt their recommendations. This study examines the barriers and facilitators to the uptake of an evidence-based CDSS as perceived by diverse health professionals in hospitals at different stages of CDSS adoption.MethodsQualitative study conducted as part of a series of randomized controlled trials of CDSSs. The sample includes two hospitals using a CDSS and two hospitals that aim to adopt a CDSS in the future. We interviewed physicians, nurses, information technology staff, and members of the boards of directors (n = 30). We used a constant comparative approach to develop a framework for guiding implementation.ResultsWe identified six clusters of experiences of, and attitudes towards CDSSs, which we label as “positions.” The six positions represent a gradient of acquisition of control over CDSSs (from low to high) and are characterized by different types of barriers to CDSS uptake. The most severe barriers (prevalent in the first positions) include clinicians’ perception that the CDSSs may reduce their professional autonomy or may be used against them in the event of medical-legal controversies. Moving towards the last positions, these barriers are substituted by technical and usability problems related to the technology interface. When all barriers are overcome, CDSSs are perceived as a working tool at the service of its users, integrating clinicians’ reasoning and fostering organizational learning.ConclusionsBarriers and facilitators to the use of CDSSs are dynamic and may exist prior to their introduction in clinical contexts; providing a static list of obstacles and facilitators, irrespective of the specific implementation phase and context, may not be sufficient or useful to facilitate uptake. Factors such as clinicians’ attitudes towards scientific evidences and guidelines, the quality of inter-disciplinary relationships, and an organizational ethos of transparency and accountability need to be considered when exploring the readiness of a hospital to adopt CDSSs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0644-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Perspectives of residential aged care facilities' staff on the identification and recording of residents' medication‐related goals of care

“…However, staff reported concerns with increased workload and documentation burden, due to duplication of systems, as barriers to the adoption of G‐MEDSS. This finding echoes other studies reporting the impact of workflow as an issue influencing use of CCDSS . These findings highlight that a CCDSS needs to be integrated into existing documentation systems within RACFs to ensure successful implementation in routine practice.…”

“…This finding echoes other studies reporting the impact of workflow as an issue influencing use of CCDSS. 21,24 These findings highlight that a CCDSS needs to be integrated into existing documentation systems within RACFs to ensure successful implementation in routine practice. Also, participants who preferred to preserve the status quo showed resistance to the use of the CCDSS.…”

Artificial intelligence‐based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance

“…As with any other medical device, CDSSs require stringent acceptance testing, commissioning, and quality assurance by the local site . In addition, an effective implementation plan is key to overcome barriers for a successful CDSS . In the present review, we have summarized the guidance collected from the literature in order to provide CDSS implementers.…”

Status of AI-enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems Clinical Implementations in China

“…The implementation of AI+CDSSs in Chinese clinical practice are not yet widespread and implemented are often not evaluated as most satisfactory. Some underlying issues and constraints were already acknowledged in prior work (25,26). In our study we explored the prioritized concerns and challenges which accompany the implementation of AI+CDSSs in China.…”