2012
DOI: 10.1177/0010836712461463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What happens when a new government enters office? A comparison of ideological change in British and Swedish foreign policy 1991–2011

Abstract: This study analyses to what extent a change of government in times of unchanged international structure affects the ideology of foreign policy. The main contribution is to investigate the role of political culture, as reflected through institutional design, as an intervening variable. Effects of changes of government in the United Kingdom in 1997 and 2010 and in Sweden in 1994 and 2006 is studied by analysing speeches in the General Debates of the UN General Assembly. The analysis is based on four ideal types.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…30 Nevertheless, a study conducted by Douglas Brommesson and Ann-Marie Ekengren in 2013, illustrated how the change of ruling parties (or coalitions) in Sweden and the United Kingdom resulted in changes in foreign policy priorities and this change was not ascribed to any national or international security and stability factors. 31 Juliet Kaarbo (in 1996Kaarbo (in , 2012 was one of the first to analyze coalition governments and their impact on foreign policy changes. She noted that junior parties within coalitions are able to change the country's foreign policy when they are unanimous and self-determined to attain this.…”
Section: Changes In Bilateral Relations: National Identity Internal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Nevertheless, a study conducted by Douglas Brommesson and Ann-Marie Ekengren in 2013, illustrated how the change of ruling parties (or coalitions) in Sweden and the United Kingdom resulted in changes in foreign policy priorities and this change was not ascribed to any national or international security and stability factors. 31 Juliet Kaarbo (in 1996Kaarbo (in , 2012 was one of the first to analyze coalition governments and their impact on foreign policy changes. She noted that junior parties within coalitions are able to change the country's foreign policy when they are unanimous and self-determined to attain this.…”
Section: Changes In Bilateral Relations: National Identity Internal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential conflict between unity and ideological profiling is brought to the fore in coalition governments where junior coalition parties are torn between the demands of national and coalition unity (Oppermann & Brummer ; McEnhill ), and the rare opportunity to profile themselves in issues with few budgetary consequences. Instead, foreign policy is a matter of rhetoric where the spoken word reflects a party's underlying ideological beliefs (Brommesson & Ekengren ). We study junior coalition parties in a consensus context in order to explain when, how and why a junior coalition party is able to affect a government's foreign policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…På den parlamentariska arenan finns ett stort intresse för utrikespolitiska frågor, och ett flertal analyser av utrikespolitiska debatter i riksdagen har gjorts (se t.ex. Bjereld, 1992;Bjereld & Demker, 1995;Brommesson & Ekengren, 2013;Edström, 2017;Elgström, 1982;Tingsten, 1964). Stort fokus har lagts på den svenska neutralitetsprincipen, samt politisk samverkan i utrikespolitiska frågor (Brommesson, 2007;Möller, 2019;Westberg, 2003).…”
Section: Partiforskning På Den Parlamentariska Arenanunclassified
“…Tjänstemän från utrikesdepartementet i Jerusalem utryckte möjligheten att samarbeta med Sverige, som ett alternativ till både USA och Sovjetunionen (Bialer, 1990;Schatz, 2017, s. 85). I relation till neutralitetspolitiken har Sverige också haft en traditionellt välförankrad konsensus över partigränserna (Björklund, 1992;Brommesson & Ekengren, 2013). Konsensus har främst förordats av två anledningar.…”
Section: Sverige -Neutralitet Och Konsensusunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation