1990
DOI: 10.1002/tl.37219904412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What good are computers in the writing classroom?

Abstract: The computer may always be with us, but in spite of its mntfold usefulness, there is no consistent objective evidence showing that it can help students become better writers.Technology does not promise to revolutionize learning and teaching. At most, it offers a series of changes which have already modified the behavior of students within learning situations and which have altered in various ways the learning situation.-Eble, 1972.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daiute [1986, p. 153] found that most "students made signifi cantly fewer revisions when they worked on the computer than when they worked in pen." Dobberstein [1990] notes, "Despite the usefulness of computers, there is no consistent objective evidence that they can help students become better writers." While reports of negative effects may refl ect the newness of the technology at the time of the studies, later studies, such as those by Wenglinsky [1998], also have found mixed results.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daiute [1986, p. 153] found that most "students made signifi cantly fewer revisions when they worked on the computer than when they worked in pen." Dobberstein [1990] notes, "Despite the usefulness of computers, there is no consistent objective evidence that they can help students become better writers." While reports of negative effects may refl ect the newness of the technology at the time of the studies, later studies, such as those by Wenglinsky [1998], also have found mixed results.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%