Social Capital and Local Development 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54277-5_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Future for LEADER as a Catalyst of Social Innovation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2016; Secco et al . 2017a). SI requires ‘animation’ in order to activate community entrepreneurs (McElwee et al .…”
Section: Social Innovation In Rural Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2016; Secco et al . 2017a). SI requires ‘animation’ in order to activate community entrepreneurs (McElwee et al .…”
Section: Social Innovation In Rural Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LEADER 2 can also be a source of SI due to its bottom-up approach, involving coordination and networking of different local actors through Local Action Figure 1: Analytical framework for narratives of SI. Source: own elaboration based on Secco et al (2017b) and Wittmayer et al (2019) Groups (LAGs), and its recognised potential for enhancing and restoring social capital (Dargan and Shucksmith 2008;Bosworth et al 2016b;Dax et al 2016;Secco et al 2017a). SI requires 'animation' in order to activate community entrepreneurs (McElwee et al 2018) and the public sector could exercise this role by arranging alternative forms of collaborative public-sector led community initiatives (Franklin et al 2017).…”
Section: Social Innovation In Rural Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socially innovative initiatives are triggered by factors that may originate from several territorial scales and trigger a response from stakeholders in a given territory to certain problems or collective ambitions [37]. Conflicts are acknowledged as possible triggering factors [38], but can also be the direct consequence of innovations [39,40].…”
Section: Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esto estaría vinculado a la definición del propio método LEADER, es decir, al enfoque abajo-arriba y cros-sectorial, y al interés por fomentar la cooperación y los partenariados público-privados. Todo ello, en mayor o menos medida, sería la base para la generación de nuevas relaciones sociales en el territorio (Pollerman et al, 2013;Secco et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2022). No obstante, otros estudios señalan algunas limitaciones en el papel de los Grupos de Acción Local en la innovación social (Vercher, 2022c), las cuales podrían estar relacionadas con la evolución del propio programa y el exceso de burocratización, la aversión al riesgo, dinámicas clientelares o la falta de reconocimiento desde algunas instituciones regionales Dax et al, 2016;Navarro et al, 2016).…”
Section: Innovación Social Y Desarrollo Ruralunclassified