1988
DOI: 10.2307/3312163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Films We May Watch: Videotape Distribution and the First Amendment

Abstract: If the First Amendment means anything, it means that a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch.-Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 565 (1969). The video cassette recorder ("VCR")-the electronic boon of the decade-presents an important challenge for the first amendment. The VCR's importance is underscored by its explosive growth in popularity. A novelty in 1980, the VCR now is found in 37 million homes. 2 Presently devoted largely to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Karl Groskaufmanis notes, the adult videotape market not only expanded the scope of the pornographic film industry due to reduced production costs but also "decimate[d] other pornography markets" due to the VCR's apparent advantages of accessibility and privacy over the adult theater model. 54 The VCR "parallels the print media closely" in its ease of production and distribution and, furthermore, allows for "narrowcasting," or fetishistic specificity, as an extension of these advantages. 55 In Kittlerian terms, "users themselves" become "television reporters and cutters" with the advent of video.…”
Section: Steven Niedbalamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Karl Groskaufmanis notes, the adult videotape market not only expanded the scope of the pornographic film industry due to reduced production costs but also "decimate[d] other pornography markets" due to the VCR's apparent advantages of accessibility and privacy over the adult theater model. 54 The VCR "parallels the print media closely" in its ease of production and distribution and, furthermore, allows for "narrowcasting," or fetishistic specificity, as an extension of these advantages. 55 In Kittlerian terms, "users themselves" become "television reporters and cutters" with the advent of video.…”
Section: Steven Niedbalamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, while VCRs would eventually revolutionize the adult entertainment industry, they did not become a mass commodity until well after the most significant reductions in adult theaters had already occurred (Groskaufmanis, 1988). Likewise, cable television did not become a feature in most large cities until the 1980s (Enstad, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The general decline in the number of adult theaters was not the result of fundamental changes to urban economies or technological innovations, such as the introduction of the video cassette recorder or cable television. Indeed, while VCRs would eventually revolutionize the adult entertainment industry, they did not become a mass commodity until well after the most significant reductions in adult theaters had already occurred (Groskaufmanis, 1988). Likewise, cable television did not become a feature in most large cities until the 1980s (Enstad, 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%