What factors predict the confidence of palliative care delivery in long‐term care staff? A mixed‐methods study

Abstract

Background: Research has indicated that clinical staff in long-term care often lack self-confidence in palliative care delivery, particularly at the end of life.Goals: (a) To examine the contribution of age, palliative care education, palliative care work-related experience and psychological empowerment to palliative care delivery confidence and (b) to explore the social reality shaping those factors for long-term care staff.Design: Explanatory sequential design.Setting: Twenty long-term care facilities in two district health boards in New Zealand. Participants: Phase 1:139 clinical staff. Phase 2:46 clinical staff who provided care in the last month of a residents' life. Methods: Phase 1: Cross-sectional survey. Phase 2: Individual semi-structured interviews. Results: Phase 1: Previous experience (β = .319) and psychological empowerment (β = .311) contribute most to predicting an increase in palliative care delivery confidence. Phase 2: Four factors underlay palliative care delivery confidence, (a) mentorship by hospice nurses or colleagues (b) contextual factors (organisational culture, resources and experience), (c) maturity and (d) formal education.Conclusion: Organisational leadership should use multiple strategies (e.g. powersharing, increased opportunities for mentorship) to improve staff palliative care delivery confidence. Implications for Practice:This study adds to the literature in understanding the predictors of palliative care delivery confidence specific to long-term care staff. The results indicate that educational interventions must be contextually appropriate to achieve sustainable improvements in palliative care confidence and ultimately in resident care at the end of life. K E Y W O R D Scare of older people, education, empowerment, long-term care, mixed-methods, palliative care, staff confidence

Facilitators and barriers perceived by health professionals in the implementation of Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) psychotherapy in Santiago

“…Likewise, the professionals reported that they felt more confidence and security in their ability to do their jobs, and that having the CALM framework contributed to this perception of self-sufficiency. This is consistent with other work in oncology and PC and shows that training in this area not only has a positive impact on patients, but also on providers [17,18]. In this respect, CALM is perceived as a beneficial tool for clinical work, which would facilitate its implementation.…”

Volunteers’ experiences building relationships with long-term care residents who have advanced dementia

“…Furthermore, research examining the effectiveness of formalized mentorship programs in facilitating the integration of new staff members has shown promising results, including higher staff retention rates ( Hegeman et al, 2007 ) and increased confidence in palliative care delivery ( Frey et al, 2020 ). Although current mentorship programs support staff by cultivating strong relationships, one can easily imagine extensions to volunteers.…”

Continuums of Change in a Competence-Building Initiative Addressing End-of-Life Communication in Swedish Elder Care

“…The perceived lack of clarity about mandate links to an area that permeated all themes, related to increasing awareness and discussion of the need for organizational support for conducting EoL conversations systematically. Contextual conditions, that is, resources, time, and work culture, are known to influence the impact and sustainability of competence-building initiatives in elder care (Frey et al, 2019;Gilissen et al, 2017;Nilsen et al, 2018), appearing able to both inhibit and facilitate change processes in practice.…”

“…Similarly, international research on staff attitudes to EoL conversations illustrates challenges; while EoL communication with care recipients and relatives is considered an important aspect of care, staff often find it difficult to address the EoL and may avoid the topic altogether (Almack et al, 2012;Broom et al, 2014). In the RCH setting, there is a particular need for EoL communication training (Chung et al, 2016), as assistant nurses (ANs), who are primary caregivers to dying residents, often lack training in, and confidence for, discussing EoL matters (Frey et al, 2019). Reflecting on dying and death, including one's own mortality, has been proposed one means of preparing RCH staff to support residents at the EoL, for example, by enhancing self-awareness of own emotions in relation to death (Österlind et al, 2011).…”