2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep14551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What factors control superficial lava dome explosivity?

Abstract: Dome-forming eruption is a frequent eruptive style and a major hazard on numerous volcanoes worldwide. Lava domes are built by slow extrusion of degassed, viscous magma and may be destroyed by gravitational collapse or explosion. The triggering of lava dome explosions is poorly understood: here we propose a new model of superficial lava-dome explosivity based upon a textural and geochemical study (vesicularity, microcrystallinity, cristobalite distribution, residual water contents, crystal transit times) of cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2108
2108

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is further enhanced by the periodic pulsing of gas pressure within the dome's pore space and likely pushes longer‐term variations in dome gas flow toward the development of large overpressures which may induce dome destruction. These relationships may explain observations of rapid cycling of lava dome growth and destruction at the onset of such eruptive periods as noted by Boudon et al (). In this period, gas flux is generally high and lava domes relatively small, yielding the appropriate combination of values in the dimensionless parameter β . Because of system nonlinearity, the difference between pore pressure and load (effective tension) causes formation of a highly pressurized, shallow layer near the outer surface of the dome, which may be easily destabilized, resulting in failure and possibly explosive decompression, as proposed by Woods et al ().…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is further enhanced by the periodic pulsing of gas pressure within the dome's pore space and likely pushes longer‐term variations in dome gas flow toward the development of large overpressures which may induce dome destruction. These relationships may explain observations of rapid cycling of lava dome growth and destruction at the onset of such eruptive periods as noted by Boudon et al (). In this period, gas flux is generally high and lava domes relatively small, yielding the appropriate combination of values in the dimensionless parameter β . Because of system nonlinearity, the difference between pore pressure and load (effective tension) causes formation of a highly pressurized, shallow layer near the outer surface of the dome, which may be easily destabilized, resulting in failure and possibly explosive decompression, as proposed by Woods et al ().…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This is further enhanced by the periodic pulsing of gas pressure within the dome's pore space and likely pushes longer-term variations in dome gas flow toward the development of large overpressures which may induce dome destruction. These relationships may explain observations of rapid cycling of lava dome growth and destruction at the onset of such eruptive periods as noted by Boudon et al (2015). In this period, gas flux is generally high and lava domes relatively small, yielding the appropriate combination of values in the dimensionless parameter .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Las propiedades reológicas que manifiestan ambos sectores se corresponden con un núcleo caracterizado por deformación dúctil (importantes evidencias de flujo, plegamientos y corrugaciones) y una corteza con deformación frágil (brechamiento y textura lajosa). En general esta última puede ser una capa relativamente permeable a través de la cual se produce desgasificación (calder et al, 2015) y explicaría la presencia de cristobalita sineruptiva en los sectores externos del domo, donde además la disminución de la vesicularidad es mayor por escape de gases (Boudon et al, 2015) y propiciaría la formación de las lentícu-las de vidrio que interpretamos como relictos de fragmentos pumíceos. Las evidencias petrológicas indican que estas rocas podrían integrar una secuencia de diferenciación a través de procesos de cámara como cristalización fraccionada que están siendo evaluados en un conjunto de datos analíticos más amplio que incluyen rocas básicas e información isotópica.…”
Section: Geocronologíaunclassified
“…Mount Merapi is classified into basaltic-andesitic strato volcano and lava dome [1,2,3,4], it means that Mount Merapi is a conical volcano with a rough circular mound-shaped protrusion as result of slow extrusion of lava and may be destroyed by gravitational collapse or explosion, the collapse of lava dome can generate pyroclastic flows or nuées ardentes [5,6]. Mount Merapi is the most active volcano in Indonesia [2] as well as one of the most active volcanoes in the world [7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%