2002
DOI: 10.1257/00028280260136372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Explains the Industrial Revolution in East Asia? Evidence From the Factor Markets

Abstract: This paper presents dual estimates of total factor productivity growth (TFPG) for East Asian countries. While the dual estimates of TFPG for Korea and Hong Kong are similar to the primal estimates, they exceed the primal estimates by 1 percent a year for Taiwan and by more than 2 percent for Singapore. The reason for the large discrepancy for Singapore is because the return to capital has remained constant, despite the high rate of capital accumulation indicated by Singapore's national accounts. This discrepan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
211
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(5 reference statements)
14
211
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…3. This decomposition, for example, has been instrumental for the analysis of the information and communication technology (ICT) revolution (Jorgenson & Stiroh, 2000;Oliner & Sichel, 2000), the rapid growth of East Asian economies (Hsieh, 2002;Young, 1995), and the productivity gap between Europe and the United States (van Ark, O'Mahony, & Timmer, 2008 Acemoglu and Dell (2010) and Gennaioli et al (2013), this should not have a major impact on the analysis. 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. This decomposition, for example, has been instrumental for the analysis of the information and communication technology (ICT) revolution (Jorgenson & Stiroh, 2000;Oliner & Sichel, 2000), the rapid growth of East Asian economies (Hsieh, 2002;Young, 1995), and the productivity gap between Europe and the United States (van Ark, O'Mahony, & Timmer, 2008 Acemoglu and Dell (2010) and Gennaioli et al (2013), this should not have a major impact on the analysis. 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young (1995) seems to downplay the role of pure technological progress in the rapid growth of newly industrialized East Asian countries in the Nineties, finding that the "growth miracle" of those years was almost entirely due to increasing labour force participation and improved labour quality. On the other hand, Hsieh (2002), examining the same episodes, finds a larger role for technological progress by considering factor returns instead of quantities in growth accounting. Similar exercises have been performed for the analysis of US exceptional growth rates in the mid-Nineties (Oliner and Sichel 2000, Jorgenson and Stiroh 2000, Whelan 2000, but were mainly targeted to the identification of which part of technological progress played the largest role in enhancing growth.…”
Section: Insert Figure 1 About Herementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The limited gap in TFP growth is con…rmed by subsequent studies -e.g. Hsieh (2002) -and suggests that growth in East Asia has been fundamentally driven by the rise in factor inputs. The overwhelming growth observed in output and manufacturing exports thus appears tangled to the pace of capital accumulation, rather than explained by technology spillovers.…”
Section: Total Factor Productivity Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The …rst, emphasized by Hsieh (2002), is that, during the crucial period 1970-90, the return to capital in Singapore has remained remarkably constant, despite the high rate of capital accumulation indicated by national accounts. We relate this stylized fact to the plausibility of the AK production function assumed in this paper.…”
Section: Calibrated Transitional Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation