2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0351.2009.00347.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What explains persistent inflation differentials across transition economies?1

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) For all countries, there is also an inflationary effect of public spending if governments spend inefficiently or keep high expenditures during a period of income growth above the growth of output. For these reasons, we assume that the higher the deficit in the government budget, government spending, and total debt, the higher the inflation (Hammermann and Flanagan, 2009). These variables construct the first version of our model:…”
Section: Modeling Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) For all countries, there is also an inflationary effect of public spending if governments spend inefficiently or keep high expenditures during a period of income growth above the growth of output. For these reasons, we assume that the higher the deficit in the government budget, government spending, and total debt, the higher the inflation (Hammermann and Flanagan, 2009). These variables construct the first version of our model:…”
Section: Modeling Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We model inflation with different nonmonetary variables such as GDP growth, unemployment rates, government spending, investment, total government debt, current account balance, and balance of the government budget as proposed by other articles (Cottarelli et al, 1998;Fakher, 2016;Hammermann & Flanagan, 2009). We use two different dummy variables to account for two possible effects of EZ membership on inflation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backé et al (2003) for early attempt to quantify the effect of different factors in Central and Eastern Europe. More recently, Hammermann (2007), Hammermann and Flanagan (2009), Choueiri et al (2008), Mody and Ohnsorge (2007) and Zoli (2009) analysed inflation developments in Central and Eastern Europe. On the issue, see also Dobrinsky (2006), Lommatzsch and Tober (2004) and MacDonald and Wójcik (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher relative inflation may have detrimental effects on demand-driven catch-up growth (McCombie and Thirwall 1994) through lowering the price competitiveness of exports. Inflation differentials has been discussed in recent economic literature (Angeloni et al 2006;_ Egert et al 2004;Hammermann and Flanagan 2009;MacDonald and Wójcik 2008). The approach of this article differs because it deals with inflation by using the concept of the Phillips curve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%