2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-021-00847-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Executive Function Network is that? An Image-Based Meta-Analysis of Network Labels

Abstract: Availability of data and material: Unthresholded and thresholded statistical maps of the image-based meta-analysis results are available for download from NeuroVault (https://identifiers.org/neurovault.collection:8448). Code availability: The NiMARE software used for the image-based meta-analysis results reported in this manuscript is available for download (https://nimare.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html; https://github.com/neurostuff/NiMARE). Author Contributions: HvEV, STW, MCR, and ARL conceived of and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it warrants noting that there is currently no standard classification system for large-scale functional networks. The lack of universal nomenclature presents a significant barrier to interpreting neural outcomes, especially given the multitude of naming schemes 43 and inconsistent application of common labels (see meta-analysis of executive control network topography 127 ). We use the functional network terms “frontoparietal control network”, “default mode network”, and “salience network” primarily due to their ubiquity in cognitive neuroscience 43 and the mindfulness literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it warrants noting that there is currently no standard classification system for large-scale functional networks. The lack of universal nomenclature presents a significant barrier to interpreting neural outcomes, especially given the multitude of naming schemes 43 and inconsistent application of common labels (see meta-analysis of executive control network topography 127 ). We use the functional network terms “frontoparietal control network”, “default mode network”, and “salience network” primarily due to their ubiquity in cognitive neuroscience 43 and the mindfulness literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highlighted frontoparietal states 1 and 2 were both characterized by phase coherence between areas commonly assigned to a network described as, e.g., the "frontoparietal" network, "central executive", "executive control", or "dorsal attention" network (Witt et al, 2021). Similarly, these brain states expressed phase coherence between regions in the cingulum and some regions around the parieto-occipital fissure (see Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the digit-span task, despite previous studies showing improved working memory performance in gamers (e.g., N-back task 15 ), we did not expect any differences between gamers and non-gamers in memorizing digits, as this is not usually a beneficial attribute in video games. However, it is possible that working memory may still benefit from video games, as this cognitive function could be facilitated by improvement in attention or processing speed since the brain networks mediating memory functions and executive function appear to overlap 36 . There were no differences between groups and conditions in the choice-RT task as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%