2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2015.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What dynamics can be expected for mixed states in two-slit experiments?

Abstract: Weak-measurement-based experiments [Kocsis et al., Science 332 (2011) 1170 have shown that, at least for pure states, the average evolution of independent photons in Young's two-slit experiment is in compliance with the trajectories prescribed by the Bohmian formulation of quantum mechanics. But, what happens if the same experiment is repeated assuming that the wave function associated with each particle is different, i.e., in the case of mixed (incoherent) states? This question is investigated here by means o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it must be P3 that fails to hold in that interpretation. Indeed, it is known in the context of doubleslit interference that the Bohmian guidance equation is nonlinear in the density operator 37,38 . It would be interesting for future work to calculate p(f 1 , f 2 ) for this experiment within a Bohmian description.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it must be P3 that fails to hold in that interpretation. Indeed, it is known in the context of doubleslit interference that the Bohmian guidance equation is nonlinear in the density operator 37,38 . It would be interesting for future work to calculate p(f 1 , f 2 ) for this experiment within a Bohmian description.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, because there is no energy dissipation, there will not be spatial localization either, which means that the trajectories will not remain within the region covered by the input state. On the contrary, they will distribute according (27) and satisfying the so-called non-crossing rule, i.e., trajectories cannot cross one another, because nonlocal spatial information still remains [52,53].…”
Section: Decoherence-induced Dynamics a Effective Modeling Of Decoher...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is shown, this leads to a bare addition of level populations, which in the energy representation manifest as a collapse of the density matrix to its diagonal, while in the position representation the probability density asymptotically approaches a non-homogeneous, delocalized density distribution along the cavity. Furthermore, in order to provide a clearer picture of the decoherence dynamics, i.e., the transition from a highly organized interferencemediated structure to a stationary (equilibrium) state due to decoherence, the generation of the quantum carpet has also been monitored with the aid of Bohmian trajectories, which have already been used to explore analogous effects in the context of the two-slit experiment [51][52][53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those trajectories whose starting points are near the upper slit (z > 0) cannot go to the region below some point with z = 0 on the screen and vice-versa. Thus there is a kind of fictitious barrier between the two regions, so that the two families of trajectories appear to repel each other [10,26,27,28,29,30]. Conversely, by knowing the point at which the particle reaches the screen, one can identify the slit through which it has emanated.…”
Section: Interference In Dbb Quantum Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%