What drives restaurant competitive productivity (CP): a comprehensive examination at meso-micro levels

Abstract

Purpose This study identified essential drivers of competitive productivity (CP) within the restaurant context at the meso-micro levels. Following evidence from previous research, this paper aims to discover if the relationships between the proposed drivers and restaurant competitive productivity (RCP) would differ based upon years in operations as a restaurant business (startup vs established). Design/methodology/approach Data analysis was conducted using responses obtained from US restaurant managers. Structural equation modeling assessed the hypothesized relationships. Additionally, multi-group analyses were conducted to test the proposed moderating roles of restaurant firm age within the proposed model. Findings Results documented that competitive personality, development and motivation were positively associated with employee competitive productivity (ECP) at the micro-level. Also, ECP, employee training, resource rareness, brand image and organizational culture were significantly and positively related to RCP at the meso-level. Additionally, the positive relationships between ECP and organizational culture, and RCP were greater in the established restaurant group compared with the startup group. However, the relationship between brand image and RCP was greater in the restaurant startup group than in the established group. Practical implications This study offered empirical evidence regarding a combination of meso and micro level drivers and their roles in improving RCP. Findings can be adopted to develop effective operational strategies to improve RCP. Originality/value Although RCP is critical and is proposed to be created by a comprehensive set of drivers considering organizational (meso-) and individual (micro-) situations, no literature has yet to adopt this comprehensive approach to assess RCP. This study focused on firm age and offered new knowledge about the need for developing specific strategies to improve RCP.

Extracting Insights From Competitor's Mistakes: A Sentiment Analysis Approach Using Competitive set Online Reviews

“…Identifying the unique selling propositions can be done using the predefined characteristics of the product or by the customers who share their experience with the product online [9]. Konstantopoulou et al [10] used in-depth interviews to understand the connection of the eWOM with the customer's SME choice finding that the customers tend to reflect their previous experience when choosing the product and prefer the well-evaluated products (mainly on the online platforms or by the influencer) [10].…”

The Influence of Innovation Practices on the Productivity and Survival of Micro-Business Restaurants During Post-Pandemic Covid-19

“…The result of this study shows the significant and positive effect of the implementation of marketing innovation and the introduction of technology on the productivity of SMEs in the tourism industry. A study in the USA by Cho and Bonn (2021) explains restaurants are a business that is dominated by small and medium enterprises (SMEs). In particular, restaurants undergo a 60% failure rate within the first year of their opening.…”

“…The dependent variables contain two variables. The first dependent variable, which is restaurant productivity, was evaluated using five items by adapting Cho and Bonn's (2021) study. The second dependent variable, which is restaurant survival, was adopted from Islam et al (2021) and Naidoo (2010) and it has eight items under it.…”

Enhancing Brand Equity Through Sustainable Tourism Marketing: A Study on Home-Stays in Malaysia

“…The homestay business is a component of the larger hospitality industry. It has the special characteristics of intangibility, variability, and inseparability, making the shaping of brand equity especially pertinent (González-Mansilla et al, 2019;Cho et al, 2021). Homestays are also regarded as a major component of rural CBT and represent an authentic locally run experience (Dangi & Jamal, 2016).…”