What drives public acceptance of chemical industrial park policy and project in China?

Abstract

Chemical industrial park (CIP) policy is becoming a vital national strategy of circular economy in China and a means to enhance energy and resource efficiency, environmental performance, and economic competitiveness. It also aims to avoid environmental risks of the decentralized chemical plants that have been a subject of public protests as local citizens' fear for chemical pollution and human's health. Public acceptance is therefore a major factor determining the success of CIP policy and project. This paper aims to investigate what drives public acceptance and rejection of chemical industrial park policies and projects in China. Our focus is on citizens in three coastal cities located in high environmental and risk sensitive areas: Dalian at Liaoning Province, Maoming at Guangdong Province, and Xiamen at Fujian Province. This is where several chemical industrial parks are (proposed) located. Based on surveys in these three representative cities, we have examined the nature and level of public acceptance towards chemical industrial park policies and projects. Results show that respondents were more positive towards the national policy, but more negative of CIP policy at the city and project level. Public acceptance of CIP policy and project was significantly influenced by factors including income, environmental value, perceived risks, procedural justice, distributive justice, benefits of CIP, and the residential distance to a CIP project. The identified factors provide a basis for anticipating and understanding likely public acceptance and should be considered in decision-making of CIP policy and project.

Public Participation and Information Disclosure for Environmental Sustainability of 2022 Winter Olympics

“…As a contribution towards understanding the picture of information disclosure and public participation, the present paper examines the host resident's perception and engagement of the preparation for the 2022 Winter Olympic Games in Beijing and Zhangjiakou. Public participation has been flagged as a key factor for socially acceptable environmental policies and projects [22][23][24]. Public participation refers here to processes organized by responsible parties (e.g., government agencies, other public-or private-sector organizations, and the public) to deliberately engage the public in the planning, development, and implementation of Beijing 2022 [9].…”

A summary of the investigation report on the Tianjiayi explosion incident (21 March 2019)

“…Chemical Industrial Park (CIP) policy is a national strategy in China that holds the objective of energy saving and resource efficiency, as well as improving economic competitiveness . Therefore, XEIP was established in Jiangsu province.…”

“…Chemical Industrial Park (CIP) policy is a national strategy in China that holds the objective of energy saving and resource efficiency, as well as improving economic competitiveness. 5 toluidine, and others, which are mainly used in the production of pesticides, dyes, medicine, and so forth. About 600-700 kg of nitration waste was produced daily from the phenylenediamine process.…”

A brief report on the March 21, 2019 explosions at a chemical factory in Xiangshui, China

“…According to Hazardous Chemicals Directory (2015 Edition), there are 2828 hazardous chemicals, including 148 highly toxic items, produced and used in China. Meanwhile, chemical industrial park (CIP) policy is a national strategy in China, which aims at decreasing the environmental risk of decentralized chemical plants and promoting recycle economy and clean production. In fact, according to a survey by China Petroleum and Chemical Industry Federation, there were 502 CIPs across 31 provinces in mainland China by the end of 2015.…”