What drives global science? The four competing narratives

Abstract

Since 1990 there has been remarkable growth and diversification of worldwide capacity and output in science, and a distinctive global science system has emerged, primarily grounded in research universities, fostered by Internet-mediated communication and publication in English, cross-border authorship and researcher mobility. While global science overlaps with and is affected by national science systems, it is constituted by pan-national knowledge flows and collegial collaboration and has partial autonomy. Four different interpretive frameworks (narratives) have evolved to explain global science: science as an expanding cross-border network; science as an arms race between competing nations; science as a global market of competing 'World-Class Universities'; and science as a centre-periphery hierarchy in which emerging countries are permanently constrained by Euro-American dominance. The paper reviews each narrative in relation to the literature, especially in scientometrics, and empirical tendencies in global science, tracked in secondary data derived from bibliometric collections. While each narrative contains at least a grain of truth, each also conflicts with the others and each is radically insufficient. A better explanation of the drivers of global science combines ( 1) flat open networked relations with (2) the inequalities and closures shaped by global hegemony, arbitrarily modified by (3) national governments and specific resources.

Bibliometric Mapping of Research Trends on Financial Behavior for Sustainability

“…Even the journals associated with the WoS category "Business, Finance" are only in the third quartile. Therefore, we are facing an emerging issue that, for now, is advancing from the knowledge peripheral [107], a question that is necessary to improve in favor of better social sustainability conditions [108].…”

Academic vs. Biological Age in Research on Academic Careers: A Large-scale Study with Implications for Scientifically Developing Systems

“…The idea of core and peripheries (Olechnicka et al, 2018) dates back to the work of Immanuel Wallerstein (1976), but it is increasingly criticized today on the basis of global publication patterns. For example, Marginson (2021) indicates the growing role of newcomers in the global circulation of knowledge, which changes the traditional core-periphery picture and challenges the traditional narratives about where science is produced.…”

Are papers published in predatory journals worthless? A geopolitical dimension revealed by content-based analysis of citations

“…Central countries such as Germany, Canada, and Spain have fewer than 15 occurrences each. This clearly points out geopolitical bias because even when the advantage of research in Western countries in terms of funding or number of publications is shifting, we can still point out significant Western cultural hegemony in science (Marginson, 2021).…”