2007
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbm012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What drives agrifood firms to register for an Environmental Management System?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
49
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
49
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Proposition 2 also suggests that a standardized EMS is more likely to be voluntarily adopted by well established firms that are subject to a lower level of uncertainty (as measured by ρ). In several empirical studies, such as those by Nakamura et al (2001), Bansal and Bogner (2002), Grolleau et al (2007) and Blackman and Guerrero (2011), it has also been reported that there is a positive correlation between size (as proxied by BAU emissions) and S-adoption. Our results are also consistent with this result although it is fair to acknowledge that, in our model, this positive relationship between the size of firms and their tendency to adopt a standardized EMS arises once we assume that the planner behaves optimally when designing the environmental policy.…”
Section: Predictions and Connections With Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Proposition 2 also suggests that a standardized EMS is more likely to be voluntarily adopted by well established firms that are subject to a lower level of uncertainty (as measured by ρ). In several empirical studies, such as those by Nakamura et al (2001), Bansal and Bogner (2002), Grolleau et al (2007) and Blackman and Guerrero (2011), it has also been reported that there is a positive correlation between size (as proxied by BAU emissions) and S-adoption. Our results are also consistent with this result although it is fair to acknowledge that, in our model, this positive relationship between the size of firms and their tendency to adopt a standardized EMS arises once we assume that the planner behaves optimally when designing the environmental policy.…”
Section: Predictions and Connections With Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some of the research continues to show than non-economic factors can drive the use of these voluntary instruments more strongly than economic incentives [24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 These sets of firm and worker characteristics are usually used in the literature respectively as the determinants of the decision to adopt environmental-related standards (Grolleau et al, 2007b) and individuals' attitudes towards environmental-related issues (Torgler and Garcia-Valinas, 2007). 14 Considering the suspicion of colinearity between the job characteristics and the indicators of work organization, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated and showed no evidence of partial correlation.…”
Section: The Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%