2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2008.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What drives acquisitions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only significant deal-related control variable is whether the target company is listed or unlisted. As expected, abnormal returns are significantly higher for acquisitions of unlisted firms (Farinós Viñas et al, 2017;Martynova and Renneboog, 2011;Petmezas, 2009).…”
Section: Abnormal Returns For Acquiring Firms Around Acquisition Anno...supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The only significant deal-related control variable is whether the target company is listed or unlisted. As expected, abnormal returns are significantly higher for acquisitions of unlisted firms (Farinós Viñas et al, 2017;Martynova and Renneboog, 2011;Petmezas, 2009).…”
Section: Abnormal Returns For Acquiring Firms Around Acquisition Anno...supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In order to reproduce the observed scale-free degree distribution of the real-world network, the selection criteria for both link creation and the merging process follow a preferential attachment rule [34]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the merging activity of firms in the real economy follows waves of market sentiment and depends on many factors, for example the size and the stock market performance of the involved firms [35,36]. As a simplification, we do not consider these factors here and utilize the simple assumption of preferential attachment to reproduce the basic statistical characteristics of the real-world network.…”
Section: Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improvement of the model leads to the hypothesis that pairs of firms that allocate their input/output similarly show a higher probability to merge. A more detailed investigation of this hypothesis is subject to future studies in order to complement the literature on drivers of the merging of firms [35,36].…”
Section: Impacts Of Merging Preferences and Substitution Of Links On mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars, such as Daniya et al (2016) and Weitzel & McCarthy (2011), have emphasized that the primary motivation behind M&A is to gain synergy in terms of operating and financial advantages, which can lower costs or increase revenue. Neoclassical theory has been employed by Polemis &Paleologos (2014) andPetmezas (2009). In addition, the behavioral approach has been utilized by Polemis & Paleologos (2014) and Shleifer & Vishny (2003).…”
Section: Theoretical Referentialmentioning
confidence: 99%