2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2051009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Stronger? The Impact of the 1918 Spanish Flu Epidemic on Economic Performance in Sweden

Abstract: We study the impact of the 1918 influenza pandemic on economic performance in Sweden. The pandemic was one of the severest and deadliest pandemics in human history, but it has hitherto received only scant attention in the economic literature -despite important implications for modern-day pandemics. In this paper, we exploit seemingly exogenous variation in incidence rates between Swedish regions to estimate the impact of the pandemic. Using differencein-differences and high-quality administrative data from Swe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be assessed to be in tandem with the finding of this study which found an absence of new jobs with the corresponding retrenchment of workers as one of the impacts of COVID-19 on indigenous contractors in developing economies. On the contrary, the finding of this study finds no alignment with Karlsson et al (2012) which found robust evidence that influenza had no discernable effect on earnings; although the study acknowledged the strangeness of its finding as it goes against most previous empirical studies, as well as theoretical postulations. A further comparison of the finding of this study with the impact of the Asia flu of 1957 shows an alignment with the findings of Saunders-Hastings and Kreweski (2016) that there was societal disruption due to school and workplace absenteeism, though mostly amongst children, school teachers and healthcare workers.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This could be assessed to be in tandem with the finding of this study which found an absence of new jobs with the corresponding retrenchment of workers as one of the impacts of COVID-19 on indigenous contractors in developing economies. On the contrary, the finding of this study finds no alignment with Karlsson et al (2012) which found robust evidence that influenza had no discernable effect on earnings; although the study acknowledged the strangeness of its finding as it goes against most previous empirical studies, as well as theoretical postulations. A further comparison of the finding of this study with the impact of the Asia flu of 1957 shows an alignment with the findings of Saunders-Hastings and Kreweski (2016) that there was societal disruption due to school and workplace absenteeism, though mostly amongst children, school teachers and healthcare workers.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of the Spanish flu on earnings, capital returns and poverty were estimated for Sweden between 1858 and 1930 using official datasets [23]. It was understood that the pandemic affected poverty and returns on capital negatively, while effects on earnings and effective income were ambiguous.…”
Section: Effects Of Epidemics Throughout Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the outbreak of COVID-19 is not the first communicable disease with intense economic and trade effects around the globe (Morens et al 2020). Similar to other epidemics, such as the Spanish flu of 1918, the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted global production, consumption and trade patterns, both directly and indirectly, as a result of lockdowns, social distancing and other related measures introduced by various countries to curb the spread of the disease (Espitia et al 2022;Karlsson et al 2012). As such, temporary shutdowns of manufacturing plants in China, Europe, the United States and other countries led to a decline in the supply of exportable merchandise and to a disruption in global supply chains (GSCs).…”
Section: Insights From Theoretical and Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%