2005
DOI: 10.1257/000282805774670004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Does the Taxable Income Elasticity Say About Dynamic Responses to Tax Changes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the long-run revenue offset could be overstated to the extent that some of the observed behavior refl ects shifting between the individual and corporate tax bases (Gordon and Slemrod, 2000) or refl ects the recovery from the recession in 2004 and 2005, which was likely partly due to the macroeconomic effects of the tax cuts. Carroll and Hrung (2005) discuss issues in applying taxable income elasticities. 33 Feldstein (1997Feldstein ( , 1999 and Slemrod (2001) discuss the sources of behavioral responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the long-run revenue offset could be overstated to the extent that some of the observed behavior refl ects shifting between the individual and corporate tax bases (Gordon and Slemrod, 2000) or refl ects the recovery from the recession in 2004 and 2005, which was likely partly due to the macroeconomic effects of the tax cuts. Carroll and Hrung (2005) discuss issues in applying taxable income elasticities. 33 Feldstein (1997Feldstein ( , 1999 and Slemrod (2001) discuss the sources of behavioral responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feldstein (2006) examines a 1 percent increase in all marginal tax rates, assuming a price elasticity of taxable income of 0.4 and an income elasticity of taxable income of 0.15, and estimates a revenue offset of 32 percent. Carroll and Hrung (2005) examine an increase in the top two brackets to 36 and 39.6 percent and estimate an offset of 54 percent, assuming an elasticity of 0.2 for taxpayers with income between $50,000 and $100,000 that increases linearly to 0.4 for taxpayer with income of $300,000 or more. Thus, given an estimated taxable income elasticity of 0.317, found in this study's base specification, these results suggest that the revenue offset due to a taxable income response are likely to be in the neighborhood of 20 percent, though they may be higher.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R evenue estimation practices in the United States have recently received widespread attention (Diamond and Moomau, 2003;Altshuler et al, 2005;Auerbach, 2005;Carroll and Hrung, 2005;Page, 2005;Diamond, 2005;Gale and Orszag, 2005;Mankiw and Weinzierl, 2006;Feldstein, 2008;Leeper and Yang, 2008), but much less attention has been paid to this issue in other countries. In this paper, we consider this issue in the context of Norway, using as an example the personal income tax cuts enacted in 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimate the magnitudes of these various effects, i.e., behavioral effects and interactions with other tax bases, and compare aggregate measures from this more ambitious revenue estimating approach to estimates obtained under current static revenue estimating practices. The paper thus presents an estimate of the extent to which tax cuts may be "self-fi nancing" due to such behavioral and interaction effects, as discussed by Lindsey (1987), Feldstein (1995Feldstein ( , 2008, Carroll and Hrung (2005), and Mankiw and Weinzierl (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%