2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3401533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Does Peer-to-Peer Lending Evidence Say About the Risk-taking Channel of Monetary Policy?

Abstract: This paper uses loan application-level data from a peer-to-peer lending platform to study the risk-taking channel of monetary policy. By employing a direct ex-ante measure of risk-taking and estimating the simultaneous equations of loan approval and loan amount, we are the first to provide quantitative evidence of the impact of monetary policy on the risk-taking of nonbank financial institution. We find that the search-for-yield is the main workhorse of the risk-taking effect, while we do not observe consisten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, we go beyond its use as a control or composite variable and study the value-relevance of linguistic errors in a financial context. It must also be noted that our focus on ICOs significantly contrasts with the P2P crowdfunding setting used by Gao et al (2021), where the platform provides guarantees to investors and, therefore, takes the investment risk (Huang et al 2021a). 4 On the contrary, in the context of ICOs, participants are not lenders, but investors in tradable securities who bear the risk of their decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, we go beyond its use as a control or composite variable and study the value-relevance of linguistic errors in a financial context. It must also be noted that our focus on ICOs significantly contrasts with the P2P crowdfunding setting used by Gao et al (2021), where the platform provides guarantees to investors and, therefore, takes the investment risk (Huang et al 2021a). 4 On the contrary, in the context of ICOs, participants are not lenders, but investors in tradable securities who bear the risk of their decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In fact,Huang et al (2021a) discuss that P2P individual lenders do not observe the loan listings, nor make loan decisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%