1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8809(97)00015-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What does objectivity mean for analysis, valuation and implementation in agricultural landscape planning? A practical and epistemological approach to the search for sustainability in ‘agri-culture’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This point of view includes naturalistic approaches and agro-ecological approaches: the first approach studies landscape structure by inventories of the characteristics (vegetation, relief, soil, geology and climate), the second approach is a taking into account of agricultural and semi-natural elements [143]. Since the earlier work of Shafer et al [122], more recent landscape studies have included both objective and subjective approaches (See, for example: [5,11,13,99,100,141]). Colquhun [27] and Bosshard [11] pointed out that subjective approaches have the same scientific rigour as the objective approaches.…”
Section: Aesthetic Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This point of view includes naturalistic approaches and agro-ecological approaches: the first approach studies landscape structure by inventories of the characteristics (vegetation, relief, soil, geology and climate), the second approach is a taking into account of agricultural and semi-natural elements [143]. Since the earlier work of Shafer et al [122], more recent landscape studies have included both objective and subjective approaches (See, for example: [5,11,13,99,100,141]). Colquhun [27] and Bosshard [11] pointed out that subjective approaches have the same scientific rigour as the objective approaches.…”
Section: Aesthetic Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the earlier work of Shafer et al [122], more recent landscape studies have included both objective and subjective approaches (See, for example: [5,11,13,99,100,141]). Colquhun [27] and Bosshard [11] pointed out that subjective approaches have the same scientific rigour as the objective approaches. This conviction is based on the works of the German poet and scientist Goethe (1749-1832) in botany (Plant metamorphosis, 1789) and optics (Theory of colours, 1810).…”
Section: Aesthetic Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These contributions of classifications require and support the definition of normative goals, and are thus highly interdependent (cf. Bosshard, 1997), i.e. the identification of development potentials relies on performance assessments, which, in turn, rely on the identification of comparable stations and the definition of the questions at hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we regard a farm plan as a potential planning tool to integrate different values on farmland as part of a wider set of planning instruments (Bosshard, 1997;Selman, 2002). Our aim was to explore the conflicts and synergies that arise between different landscape values when developing multifunctionality on farmland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%