What Does Giving Primacy to a Certain Entity Cause in a Conceptual Model for Cataloging? Expression-Entity Dominant Model Revisited

Abstract

Which entity is given primacy in a conceptual model for cataloging is an important issue in metadata interoperability. This study investigates the implications and consequences of giving primacy to different entities among models and the merit of the expression-entity dominant model. FRBR and four other models derived from FRBR that give primacy to different entities are examined. Several modeling issues, such as optionality or necessity of establishing entity instances, cardinality between entities, and treatment of titles and statements of responsibility that appear in a resource, are examined for each model and the results are compared.

Linked data for libraries: Creating a global knowledge space, a systematic literature review

“…Merčun et al [207] proposed a model and user interface design that could support a more efficient and user-friendly presentation and navigation in bibliographic information systems based on FRBR and information visualisation. Taniguchi [208] investigated the implications and consequences of giving primacy to different entities among models and the merit of the expression-entity dominant model. Billey mentioned that with the help of the ‘FRBF Family’, cataloguers can describe bibliographic entities more than required, and as a result, the information is misidentified or censored [209].…”

Descrição arquivística, Records in Contexts (RiC) e Access to Memory (AtoM)

“…Esse cenário, porém, é alterado quando se busca identificar discussões sobre o modelo conceitual proposto pelo ICA, o RiC, visto que nenhuma das publicações recuperadas dentre as publicações dos autores mais produtivos tratavam dele, mas do FRBR, conforme foi possível avaliar nos resumos dos trabalhos de Baeuf e Doerr (2007), Bianchini e Guerrini (2015), Buizza e Guerrini (2002), Carlyle e Fusco (2007), Carlyle (2006), Doerr, Riva e Žumer (2012), Pisanski e Žumer (2009Pisanski e Žumer ( , 2012, Riva e Bellemare (2009), Riva e Oliver (2012), Riva (2007), Riva (2016), Salaba e Zhang (2007), Taniguchi (2009Taniguchi ( , 2017aTaniguchi ( , 2017b 2018), Zhang e Salaba (2007a, 2007b) e Žumer (2007. Apesar de não constar dos autores mais produtivos, visto que foram apresentados autores com mais de 3 publicações, as contribuições efetivas sobre o RiC ocorrem com Llanes-Padrón, em publicações associadas com Moro-Cabero e Pastor-Sanchez.…”