2016
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do young people think about their school-based sex and relationship education? A qualitative synthesis of young people's views and experiences

Abstract: ObjectivesAlthough sex and relationship education (SRE) represents a key strand in policies to safeguard young people and improve their sexual health, it currently lacks statutory status, government guidance is outdated and a third of UK schools has poor-quality SRE. We aimed to investigate whether current provision meets young people's needs.DesignSynthesis of qualitative studies of young people's views of their school-based SRE.SettingEligible studies originated from the UK, Ireland, the USA, Australia, New … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
134
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
12
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, to date, much literature on the role of school staff in supporting student well-being has tended to reduce ‘school staff’ to ‘teachers’ and ignore the growing array of support roles within schools and their potential roles in facilitating student well-being (Van Petegem, Aelterman, Van Keer, & Rosseel, 2008). In contrast, several research articles have highlighted incongruence between the power imbalance within a teacher–student relationship and the dynamics required to address health and well-being-related issues, with staff other than classroom teachers perhaps playing important roles in connecting students to their school and supporting well-being (Bishop, Whitear, & Brown, 2001; Pound, Langford, & Campbell, 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, to date, much literature on the role of school staff in supporting student well-being has tended to reduce ‘school staff’ to ‘teachers’ and ignore the growing array of support roles within schools and their potential roles in facilitating student well-being (Van Petegem, Aelterman, Van Keer, & Rosseel, 2008). In contrast, several research articles have highlighted incongruence between the power imbalance within a teacher–student relationship and the dynamics required to address health and well-being-related issues, with staff other than classroom teachers perhaps playing important roles in connecting students to their school and supporting well-being (Bishop, Whitear, & Brown, 2001; Pound, Langford, & Campbell, 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and parents, compared to other studies [18]. These data can be related to the negative perception that adolescents have about sex education, feeling her as shameful and distant from their interests [21]. Draws attention how some point to obtain that information from the pornography, taking into account that they are all underage; or of the nature, which implies that given by known knowledge that they do not possess.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Restricting communication in this way is 'unlikely to result in a comfortable experience for either teachers or pupils, nor is it likely to achieve positive behavioural change' (Buston, Wight, & Scott, 2001, 367). The nature of teacher-student relationships create discomfort on the part of both teachers and students within SRE (Allen, 2005;Langille et al, 2001;Lester & Allan, 2006;Pound, Langford, & Campbell, 2016). These problems are attributed to the conflicting social worlds of adult teachers and adolescent students being forced into open confrontation in the SRE classroom (Allen, 2001;Langille et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%