2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2011.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do we want specifically from the cell phone? An age related study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical attributes of the product such as artistic and stylish design, storage space or capacity, battery durability, screen size, buttons and related parts and processes etc. affect the choice of consumers (Brewster, 2002;Haverila, 2011;Haverila, 2012;Suki, 2013). Consumers often consider design as the most significant determinant of their purchase decision (Crilly, Moultrie & Clarkson, 2004).…”
Section: Product Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical attributes of the product such as artistic and stylish design, storage space or capacity, battery durability, screen size, buttons and related parts and processes etc. affect the choice of consumers (Brewster, 2002;Haverila, 2011;Haverila, 2012;Suki, 2013). Consumers often consider design as the most significant determinant of their purchase decision (Crilly, Moultrie & Clarkson, 2004).…”
Section: Product Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue is whether demographic variables like age play a role in the acceptance of technology. Regarding the cell phone communication setting of this research prior research has discovered that age can indeed predict the usage of mobile technology (Assael, 1981;McLeod, 2009;Sarker and Wells, 2003), and also differences in the importance rankings of preferred features like usefulness, ease of use, price and speed of use (Haverila, 2012;Pagani, 2004) therefore confirming the use of age as a primary segmentation variable in the cell phone market. While the extant literature suggests that differences between the young people (adolescents/young adults) and older people exist, there is a lack of research examining the need for a more detailed segmentation of the adolescents/ young adults in the cell phone product-market.…”
Section: Cell Phones As Ubiquitous Communication Devicesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Previous research has focused on the frequency of mediated communication between parents and children (Hofer, 2011;Ramsey, Gentzler, Morey, Oberhauser, & Westerman, 2013), the use of relational maintenance strategies in computer-mediated communication (Houser, Fleuriet, & Estrada, 2012;Johnson, Haigh, Becker, Craig, & Wigley, 2008;Tong & Walther, 2011), and the gratifications associated with using various technologies (Haverilla, 2012;Jin & Park, 2010;Ku, Chu, & Tseng, 2013). Although most college students report using multiple forms of technology to keep in contact with their parents while they are away at school, research specific to college students tends to focus on one technology to the exclusion of others (see Chen & Katz, 2009;Trice, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%