2007
DOI: 10.1002/chin.200744242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Do We Need for a Superhydrophobic Surface? A Review on the Recent Progress in the Preparation of Superhydrophobic Surfaces

Abstract: Progress in the Preparation of Superhydrophobic Surfaces -[150 refs.]. -(LI, X.-M.; REINHOUDT*, D.; CREGO-CALAMA, M.; Chem. Soc. Rev. 36 (2007) 8, 1350-1368; Lab. Supramol. Chem. Technol., Univ. Twente, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Neth.; Eng.) -Lindner 44-242

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
325
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
325
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that for water-glycerol mixtures ranging from 0 to 40 wt.% glycerol, impacting viscous droplets are repelled in a pancake shape by the T-PTFE surface architecture for 10 We  . These water-glycerol mixtures correspond to a range of 1 Interestingly, at high viscosities (80 wt.% glycerol in the aqueous solution), droplets were no longer bouncing on the S-PTFE surface, but remained immobile on it after impact as shown in Figure 3(d). Thus, the T-PTFE architecture provides both drastically reduced contact times for viscous droplets up to 0.013 Oh  and improved repellency of impacting droplets at 0.21 Oh  compared to the S-PTFE reference surface.…”
Section: For 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that for water-glycerol mixtures ranging from 0 to 40 wt.% glycerol, impacting viscous droplets are repelled in a pancake shape by the T-PTFE surface architecture for 10 We  . These water-glycerol mixtures correspond to a range of 1 Interestingly, at high viscosities (80 wt.% glycerol in the aqueous solution), droplets were no longer bouncing on the S-PTFE surface, but remained immobile on it after impact as shown in Figure 3(d). Thus, the T-PTFE architecture provides both drastically reduced contact times for viscous droplets up to 0.013 Oh  and improved repellency of impacting droplets at 0.21 Oh  compared to the S-PTFE reference surface.…”
Section: For 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past years, a large number of methods such as laser or plasma etching, physical or chemical vapor deposition, phase separation, electrostatic spinning, and spraying have been explored to prepare super-hydrophobic surfaces. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] However, most of these techniques require severe conditions, expensive materials and/or complicated processes. Thus, sol-gel method is an alternative process with advantages that allow obtaining high quality materials of high purity, on a large scale, at low cost, and with simple equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, there has been a remarkable progress in designing and fabricating the so-called superhydrophobic surfaces, which are characterized by small-scale surface roughness that keeps the liquid interface suspended at the tips of the asperities, thus, reducing the liquid-solid contact area [1,2]. Such engineered surfaces typically exhibit large liquid contact angles, small contact angle hysteresis, low adhesion, and reduced hydrodynamic friction, which play important roles in many technological processes, including self-cleaning surfaces, such as glasses and fabrics [3], nonfouling surfaces [4], and drag reduction [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%