2019
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do we know about the fossil record of pinnipeds? A historiographical investigation

Abstract: The fossil record of pinnipeds (seals, fur seals and walruses) is globally distributed, spanning from the late Oligocene to the Holocene. This record shows a complex evolutionary history that could not otherwise be inferred from their extant relatives, including multiple radiations and iterative ecomorphological specializations among different lineages, many of which are extinct. The fossil record of pinnipeds is not uniformly represented in space and time, however, leaving some gaps in our knowledge. We perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to their poor fossil record, extinct true seals are often based on isolated postcranial material [16], and frequently restricted to just a single specimen. In this light, both the quality (skulls instead of postcrania) and abundance of the type series of Eomonachus are unprecedented [16] and substantially improves the historically poor fossil record of Australasia [36][37][38][39][40][41]. Specimens from Taranaki are often remarkably complete, thanks to being protected inside concretions.…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Fossil Record Of True Sealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owing to their poor fossil record, extinct true seals are often based on isolated postcranial material [16], and frequently restricted to just a single specimen. In this light, both the quality (skulls instead of postcrania) and abundance of the type series of Eomonachus are unprecedented [16] and substantially improves the historically poor fossil record of Australasia [36][37][38][39][40][41]. Specimens from Taranaki are often remarkably complete, thanks to being protected inside concretions.…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Fossil Record Of True Sealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, current interpretations of true seal evolution have relied on fragmentary fossil specimens, and are challenged by recent taxonomic revisions [8,9,15], as well as the lack of a comprehensive phylogenetic framework [1]. In addition, matters are complicated by a historical research bias towards the Northern Hemisphere and global rarity of informative seal fossils [16], which has led © 2020 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ‘ecomorphotype hypothesis’ states that various bone morphologies belong to ‘ecotypes’, allowing referral of otherwise unassociated fossils to a type specimen. However, a recent quantitative analysis found no support for this hypothesis [ 11 ], and several authors have placed doubts on its validity [ 9 , 15 , 57 ]. Apart from a loose association of ecology and morphology, the ‘ecomorphotype hypothesis' is in essence indistinguishable from the early work of Van Beneden [ 7 , 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the most exclusive clade assignment for any Neogene fossil pinniped from Australia. The only other fossils from the Neogene, either from the Sandringham Sandstone (late Miocene-early Pliocene) of Beaumaris (Rule et al 2020a) or from the Whalers Bluff Formation (Pliocene) of Portland (Victoria) (Fitzgerald 2005;Rule et al 2020c), are either diagnostic to Monachinae, Phocidae or Pinnipedia. The fossils from Beaumaris and Hamilton not only represent the oldest known pinnipeds from Australia, but the two ear regions represent the oldest described monachins in the world (Fig.…”
Section: Biogeographymentioning
confidence: 99%