1993
DOI: 10.1016/0742-051x(93)90018-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do students think when teachers make adaptations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is similar to that of previous studies in which general education middle school and high school students (Vaughn et al, 1993) and elementary students (Vaughn et al, in press) selected the teacher who made adaptations to meet students' special learning needs over the teacher who made fewer adaptations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is similar to that of previous studies in which general education middle school and high school students (Vaughn et al, 1993) and elementary students (Vaughn et al, in press) selected the teacher who made adaptations to meet students' special learning needs over the teacher who made fewer adaptations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The students in this study were selected from heterogeneous classes with respect to achievement, and they indicated a strong preference across achievement and grade grouping for the teacher who accommodates diverse learners in his or her instructional practice. The average/high achieving students informed us through interviews that they believe that they also benefit when the teacher helps all students understand (Vaughn et al, 1993). Less clear were students' preferences for adaptations in tests, textbooks, and homework.…”
Section: Frequency Of Students' Comments Formentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…see: Herring-Harrison et al 2007;Vaughn et al 1993), the findings of this study suggest that centralized and standardized student and school evaluation systems, in which schools and students face public scrutiny and competition for status and resources, limits the opportunity of teachers to adapt their pedagogy and curriculum to the needs of their students and stimulates teachers to put the requirements of the larger educational system first, likely at the expense of the lowest achieving students. Hence, the findings of this study build on and support Campbell"s (1976) classic law which hypothesises that the more any quantitative social indicator is used by educational policymakers, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%