1977
DOI: 10.2307/1179656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Do Schools Teach?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, completing a management degree is often a precursor to women progressing in management (Roberts & Karambayya, 2017). Yet management education programs demonstrate a predominantly masculine institutional culture (Sinclair as cited in Smith, 1997) that draws on historical assumptions about gender that constrain what men and women can achieve (Williams as cited in Apple & King, 1983). By extension, the implicit underpinnings of management education are typically associated with hard, masculine characteristics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, completing a management degree is often a precursor to women progressing in management (Roberts & Karambayya, 2017). Yet management education programs demonstrate a predominantly masculine institutional culture (Sinclair as cited in Smith, 1997) that draws on historical assumptions about gender that constrain what men and women can achieve (Williams as cited in Apple & King, 1983). By extension, the implicit underpinnings of management education are typically associated with hard, masculine characteristics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has long been argued that the critical feature distinguishing play from work may be the matter of who instigates the activity. Apple and King's (1977) early research involved observations and interviews with children and their teacher in a kindergarten classroom during the first weeks of the school year. They found that regardless of the nature of the activity itself, it was the context that determined to which of the two categories the activity belongs.…”
Section: Tensions Between Work Pedagogy and Playmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marxian analysis of education also suggests that the education system functions, through both its curricular form as well as its curricular content [Apple, 1981] to (1) maintain and extend the ideological hegemony of capitalist culture and ideology [Gramsci, 1971]; (2) provide the necessary skill qualifications for the economy by regulating the flow of students through the system [Paci, 1977]; (3) insure that its graduates assume the behavioral attitudes and values necessary for the smooth functioning of the economy {e.g., obedience, uncritical enthusiasm, adaptability, and perseverance) [Apple and King, 1977;Bowles and Gintis, 1977); and (4) guarantee the stability of the social hierarchy by screening, tracking and labelling students prior to their entry into the world of work [Boudon, 1977;Halsey, 1977, Karabel, 1977Sewell and Shah, 1977]. It also suggests that contemporary education is coming increasingly under the sway of the logic of capitalist calculation, that it is being penetrated by a Weberian form of rationality, partly in response to the existing economic crisis and partly in response to the introduction of new technologies into the classrooms.…”
Section: Radical Liberal Vs Marxian Education Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%