2001
DOI: 10.1093/jurban/78.4.679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Do Pharmacists Think About New York State's New Nonprescription Syringe Sale Program? Results of a Survey

Abstract: Access to sterile syringes can prevent transmission of blood-borne diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B and C. We conducted a survey of attitudes of pharmacists to aid in development of the Expanded Syringe Access Demonstration Program (ESAP) in New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,8 Perhaps most dramatically, since January 1, 2001, New York State has been conducting a test of a shift in policies from requiring a prescription for pharmacy syringe purchase to a policy of allowing sale of syringes by pharmacies without prescription. [9][10][11] This follows similar changes in 2000 in New Hampshire, in 1998 in Minnesota, and in 1992 in Connecticut. [12][13][14] In a national survey, 15 Burris and colleagues categorized the laws and regulations as follows: Drug paraphernalia laws in 49 states, D.C., and the Virgin Islands, generally prohibited sale, distribution, possession, manufacture, and/or advertisement of drug paraphernalia known to be used to introduce illicit drugs into the body, although for nine states syringes are exempted; syringe prescription laws in 13 states and the Virgin Islands limit the sale, distribution, and possession of syringes without a valid prescription; and regulations implemented at pharmacies restricted access to sterile syringes in some states as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…3,8 Perhaps most dramatically, since January 1, 2001, New York State has been conducting a test of a shift in policies from requiring a prescription for pharmacy syringe purchase to a policy of allowing sale of syringes by pharmacies without prescription. [9][10][11] This follows similar changes in 2000 in New Hampshire, in 1998 in Minnesota, and in 1992 in Connecticut. [12][13][14] In a national survey, 15 Burris and colleagues categorized the laws and regulations as follows: Drug paraphernalia laws in 49 states, D.C., and the Virgin Islands, generally prohibited sale, distribution, possession, manufacture, and/or advertisement of drug paraphernalia known to be used to introduce illicit drugs into the body, although for nine states syringes are exempted; syringe prescription laws in 13 states and the Virgin Islands limit the sale, distribution, and possession of syringes without a valid prescription; and regulations implemented at pharmacies restricted access to sterile syringes in some states as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Examples of these services 332 included non-dispensing services for those with mental illness, 35,50,70,79 sale of non-prescription 333 syringes (or methadone) to IDUs, 26,29,33,55,[57][58][59][60][62][63][64]66,69,74,76 services for those with, or at risk for, 334…”
Section: Confronting Inequities 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…largely, though not exclusively, focused on pharmacists' response to legislative shifts allowing 348 the sale of non-prescription syringes, 29,33,56,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]73,74,76,95 while research on mental illness has 349 focused on pharmacists' effectiveness in providing services beyond medication dispensing, 350 including counseling. 28,42,48,49,52,70,72,102 Literature on the adequacy of services for racialized 351 populations has considered disparities among racialized groups as related to pharmacy-based 352 immunization, 92,93 pharmacy or medication access, 74,99,121 alignment of pharmacists' activities 353 with patient needs/preferences, 77,81,91,94,102,119 and broader discriminatory practices.…”
Section: Confronting Inequities 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations