2000
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Do Groups Learn from Their Worldliest Members? Direct and Indirect Influence in Dynamic Teams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
113
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(25 reference statements)
4
113
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…: Gruenfled et al, 2000) and its transference (Almeida and Kogut, 1999). Consistent with Song et al (2003) and Lacetera et al (2004), our results suggest that hiring faculty and recent doctorates from other universities brings outside linkages that are associated to new methods, as well as novel forms of thinking and doing research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…: Gruenfled et al, 2000) and its transference (Almeida and Kogut, 1999). Consistent with Song et al (2003) and Lacetera et al (2004), our results suggest that hiring faculty and recent doctorates from other universities brings outside linkages that are associated to new methods, as well as novel forms of thinking and doing research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Earlier studies that examined the detrimental effects of member turnover on performance highlighted that members may take time to adjust themselves to a new learning context (Naylor and Briggs 1965), disrupt shared knowledge or mental models among existing members (Cannon-Bowers and Salas 2001), and subsequently tend to interfere with existing routines for learning (Moreland and Levine 1982). However, recent studies have elucidated the positive aspects of member turnover such as fostering the need for creativity and exploration of new knowledge (e.g., Choi and Thompson 2005;Gruenfeld, Martorana and Fan 2000). These studies emphasized that new members can add entirely different or explorative knowledge to existing knowledge bases, possibly replace redundant or inefficient knowledge, establish new learning routines, and improve existing learning processes.…”
Section: Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In completing this form of work the knowledge worker accesses data from various sources. This may include information and knowledge sources that are gathered through personnel movement (Gruenfeld et al, 2000); training (Bassi, 1997, Moreland and Mayaskovsky, 2000, Thompson et al, 2000; communication (Lasswell, 1948, Rulke, 2000, Stasser et al, 2000, Lapré and Van Wassenhove, 2001); and observations (Nonaka, 1991) between individuals, teams and organisations (Grant, 1996, Spender, 1996, Argote and Ingram, 2000b, Sveiby, 2001.…”
Section: Service Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge transfer is of particular importance due to the knowledge growth potential that occurs during the transfer of knowledge from one individual to another, and also from one organisation to another (Argote and Ingram, 2000b, Argote and Ingram, 2000a, Levine and Moreland, 2000, Sveiby, 2001). The transfer of knowledge is facilitated by meetings, personal contact and training as a means of diffusing and building knowledge (Nonaka, 1991, Argote and Ingram, 2000b, Gruenfeld et al, 2000, Moreland and Mayaskovsky, 2000, Rulke, 2000, Stasser et al, 2000, Thompson et al, 2000, Sveiby, 2001). …”
Section: Knowledge Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%