2012
DOI: 10.1108/14754391311282450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do engagement measures really mean?

Abstract: PurposeThis paper aims to discuss how and with what employees engage at work. It seeks to offer an explanation of “locus of engagement” – what aspects of their work individuals engage with to a lesser or greater extent – and “emotional” and “transactional” engagement – demonstrating that people can engage at different levels, both of which might result in performance but also in very different behaviors.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on research completed for CIPD by The Kingston Engagement Cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher performance levels are achieved by engaged employees (Bakker and Demerouti, 2008); although, the most convincing is that positive emotions are experienced by an engaged employee. To achieve challenging goals, there is need to have a sense of commitment in an engaged employee (Baron, 2013). This is because of focus and energy that help them to put extra efforts.…”
Section: Conceptual Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher performance levels are achieved by engaged employees (Bakker and Demerouti, 2008); although, the most convincing is that positive emotions are experienced by an engaged employee. To achieve challenging goals, there is need to have a sense of commitment in an engaged employee (Baron, 2013). This is because of focus and energy that help them to put extra efforts.…”
Section: Conceptual Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, engagement levels can vary and people may engage to their team (Saks & Gruman, 2014), line manager, profession, task (Baron, 2013), customer (Gourlay et al, 2012) job, and/or organization (Saks, 2006;Saks & Gruman, 2014). Consequently, engagement terms differ and when used appropriately, the terms signify that people may engage with different elements of organizational life.…”
Section: Employee Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics of the concept have dismissed work engagement as nothing new other than the same constructs known in management theory and practice such as job satisfaction and involvement. However, Baron (2013) asserts that job satisfaction is not enough for the simple reason that a satisfied employee may derive satisfaction for reason unrelated to work performance, an employee can commit just to the minimum to keep the job. Work engagement is more than just job satisfaction, but principally it is about passion, commitment, and the willingness to invest oneself and expend ones' discretionary effort to help the employer succeed.…”
Section: Concept Of Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%