2018
DOI: 10.1080/0194262x.2018.1481488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Do Chemists Cite? A 5-year Analysis of References Cited in American Chemical Society Journal Articles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These journals, the scholars concluded, "should be considered valuable or "core" across the various fields of chemistry". 29 In agreement with findings reported 10 years before by Kousha and Thelwall for which in chemistry, 88.5% of the citations retrieved by Google Scholar were from journal papers, 31 books and book chapters were cited only in 2.4% of the sampled articles, similar to conference proceedings (2.3%), and Web sites and other sources such as brief communications, dissertations, letters to the editor, notes, patents, personal communications, short surveys, and software or software manuals (2.5%). For comparison, in 2008 in physics, e-prints/ preprints accounted for 47.7% of unique citations, and in computer science, conference/workshop papers, 43.2%, were the major sources of citations.…”
Section: What Do Chemists Cite?supporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These journals, the scholars concluded, "should be considered valuable or "core" across the various fields of chemistry". 29 In agreement with findings reported 10 years before by Kousha and Thelwall for which in chemistry, 88.5% of the citations retrieved by Google Scholar were from journal papers, 31 books and book chapters were cited only in 2.4% of the sampled articles, similar to conference proceedings (2.3%), and Web sites and other sources such as brief communications, dissertations, letters to the editor, notes, patents, personal communications, short surveys, and software or software manuals (2.5%). For comparison, in 2008 in physics, e-prints/ preprints accounted for 47.7% of unique citations, and in computer science, conference/workshop papers, 43.2%, were the major sources of citations.…”
Section: What Do Chemists Cite?supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Since the seminal study of Rose-Wiles and Marzabadi identifying citation patterns of chemists publishing in ACS journals between 2011 and 2015, researchers in the chemical sciences significantly increased the share of OA papers published. , Still, the citation habits of research chemists have barely changed. It is instructive, in this respect, to review the references cited in 10 communication articles from a recent issue (50/2023) of Chemical Communications , the leading communications journal in chemistry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, an analysis of chemistry theses at Mississippi State University (Zhang 2013) and the University of Texas at Austin (Flaxbart 2018) found that citations to theses amounted to less than one percent of the total citations. Similar results were reported in a recent analysis of citations in ten different American Chemical Society journals where the citations for "other" information types, which includes theses, were found to be less than 5% (Rose-Wiles & Marzabadi 2018). The lack of discoverability and access to theses, including any substance content, could be one factor contributing to low chemistry thesis citation counts.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Although citation to these databases is steadily increasing, citation counts are low compared to article citations to chemical handbooks (Tomaszewski, 2017) and science encyclopedias (Tomaszewski, 2018). Other studies confirm that non-journal sources are not frequently cited in chemistry journals (Ortega, 2008; Rose-Wiles and Marzabadi, 2018). Thus, a complete overview of resource citations is not reflected in the citation counts, presumably because scientists are not required to cite them or do not feel the need to do so.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%