2019
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Do Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Want from the “Perfect” App? Results from the Second Diabetes MILES: Australia (MILES-2) Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings corroborate previous research on the benefits of personalization and tailoring while providing preliminary evidence on how app preferences can be personalized based on a specific user characteristic—diabetes self-management style [ 21 , 26 , 36 , 40 ]. For example, participants expressing more self-directed styles value tools that assist them in making independent, informed decisions about their own care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our findings corroborate previous research on the benefits of personalization and tailoring while providing preliminary evidence on how app preferences can be personalized based on a specific user characteristic—diabetes self-management style [ 21 , 26 , 36 , 40 ]. For example, participants expressing more self-directed styles value tools that assist them in making independent, informed decisions about their own care.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Despite the growing number of studies using mobile technologies for diabetes management [ 10 , 11 , 15 ], the effectiveness of introducing apps to people with T2DM to support their self-management at large scale remains uncertain given the generally poor quality of apps [ 12 , 13 , 32 ], unmet consumer needs [ 14 ], and studies lacking robust designs with long-term evaluations [ 10 , 15 ]. The MDC program is highly innovative with its conversational element.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commercially available apps employ limited use of behavior change techniques and inadequate features, other than self-monitoring [ 12 , 13 ]. Furthermore, people with diabetes expect apps to be engaging; incorporating multiple functions; and covering a broad range of content, including psychological and emotional support [ 14 ]. Although some recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have indicated a modest effect for app-based interventions to support diabetes self-management [ 10 , 11 , 15 ], there still remains a great deal of uncertainty about their feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness in the real world [ 10 , 15 - 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the patient perspective, studies have identified that people with T2DM do not believe apps will be useful, resulting in low uptake [12, 16–18]. Recent data from an Australian qualitative study demonstrated that people with T2DM would prefer an app to address the practical aspects of diabetes self-management and to improve, and reduce the cognitive burden of self-management [17]. Further studies using focus groups for app development have highlighted the importance of blood glucose monitoring, dietary tracking, education, interactive content, peer support and realistic goal setting [1922].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%