2013
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What determines biogeographical ranges? Historical wanderings and ecological constraints in the danthonioid grasses

Abstract: Aim We sought to understand the variables that limit the distribution range of a clade (here the danthonioid grasses). We tested time, area of origin, habitat suitability, disjunction width and nature, and wind direction as possible range determinants. Location Global, but predominantly the Southern Hemisphere. Methods We mapped the range of the subfamily Danthonioideae, and used 39,000 locality records and an ensemble modelling approach to define areas with suitable danthonioid habitat. We used a well‐sampled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The wa is introduced here as a standard metric to compare observed and expected rates of species-range expansion. This wa can also be used to compare quantitative dispersal rate estimates generated from biogeographic studies of different taxa across time and space, as for example, in the emerging fields of parametric biogeography (e.g., Landis et al 2013 ; Peter Linder et al 2013 ; Meseguer et al 2014 ) and invasion biology (e.g., Schurr et al 2012 ; Phillips 2012 ; Travis and Dytham 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wa is introduced here as a standard metric to compare observed and expected rates of species-range expansion. This wa can also be used to compare quantitative dispersal rate estimates generated from biogeographic studies of different taxa across time and space, as for example, in the emerging fields of parametric biogeography (e.g., Landis et al 2013 ; Peter Linder et al 2013 ; Meseguer et al 2014 ) and invasion biology (e.g., Schurr et al 2012 ; Phillips 2012 ; Travis and Dytham 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the realized temperature niches of the species in the common garden experiment, georeferenced occurrence data were obtained from herbarium records (Southern Hemisphere) and from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, www.gbif.org; for North American records; see R. O. W€ uest et al, unpublished;Linder et al, 2013). Temperature data for these localities were extracted from the WorldClim database (BIO1-BIO11; Hijmans et al, 2005) using ARCGIS 9.2 (ESRI, 2008.…”
Section: Temperature Conditions In the Observed Rangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several hypotheses have been invoked to explain interspecific variations in species ranges. These can be broadly classified into extrinsic ones related to historical and biogeographical variables such as species ancestral ranges and time available for range expansion after speciation (Linder, Antonelli, Humphreys, Pirie, & Wüest, 2013;Paul, Morton, Taylor, & Tonsor, 2009), or intrinsic factors linked to species traits, such as diet, environmental tolerances, and their ability to colonize new regions (Slatyer, Hirst, & Sexton, 2013;Slove & Janz, 2011). Despite the evidences linking increased ranges due to the joint action of different processes, two intrinsic traits have been considered of particular importance in explaining interspecific variations in range sizes: species climatic niche breadths and dispersal abilities (Faurby & Antonelli, 2018;Gaston, 2003;Lester, Ruttenberg, Gaines, & Kinlan, 2007;Slatyer et al, 2013;Stevens, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%