2014
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Creates Interactivity in Online News Discussions? An Exploratory Analysis of Discussion Factors in User Comments on News Items

Abstract: While the social, political, and journalistic relevance of user comments on online news items has been discussed intensively, no study has tried to examine why some online news discussions are more interactive than others. Based on the rationale of news value theory, this study argues that so-called discussion factors in user comments indicate general relevance to later users to respond to them. Qualitative interviews with users who comment on news stories online and a quantitative content analysis of 1,580 us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
106
1
17

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(124 reference statements)
7
106
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies lump swearing and other types of incivility together, but others have distinguished between various types of incivility (e.g., Coe et al, 2014). Although not identical to our two concepts, Ziegele et al (2014) separated aggression (swearing and flaming directed to other discussants) from controversy (incivility and trolling related to the topic). We separate swearing and other incivility types for the theoretical reasons described below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Some studies lump swearing and other types of incivility together, but others have distinguished between various types of incivility (e.g., Coe et al, 2014). Although not identical to our two concepts, Ziegele et al (2014) separated aggression (swearing and flaming directed to other discussants) from controversy (incivility and trolling related to the topic). We separate swearing and other incivility types for the theoretical reasons described below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Some message features, such as story frames (episodic vs. thematic; gain vs. loss) (Holton, Lee, & Coleman, 2014) and the topic and the sources quoted (Coe, Kenski, & Rains, 2014), alter the volume and the content of user comments. User comments that contain uncertainty, controversy, negativity, and personalization are also more likely to beget responses from other users (Ziegele, Breiner, & Quiring, 2014). However, it remains relatively unknown what motivates people to initiate and engage in online commenting and news sharing.…”
Section: Why Audiences Choose To Provide Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the growing popularity of leaving and reading comments online, these spaces for public discourse have become an important topic for communication research. Scholars have examined news comment sections to understand the impact of interactivity and other content features (Weber, 2014;Ziegele, Breiner, & Quiring, 2014), the quality of news comments (Coe et al, 2014;Rowe, 2015aRowe, , 2015bSantana, 2014), motivations for commenting (Springer, Engelmann, & Pfaffinger, 2015;Stroud et al, 2016), personal characteristics of news commenters (Wu & Atkin, 2017), and the influence of news comments on users' evaluation of news articles and social issues (Anderson, Brossard, Scheufele, Xenos, & Ladwig, 2014;Prochazka et al, 2016) and their future commenting behaviors (Rösner & Krämer, 2016). In addition, from the perspective of journalists, there have been a number of studies of how reporters and editors react to and negotiate the value of news comments (e.g., Loke, 2012;Nielsen, 2014;Robinson, 2010).…”
Section: Online News Commentingmentioning
confidence: 99%