2013
DOI: 10.1215/00267929-2073043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Counts as World Literature?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, these modes of reading offer us a tangled web of new interpretations of Bhagat Singh’s revolutionary thought, which was rooted in contagious affect, aesthetic pleasure, and political assuredness, rather than simply the final option. By highlighting the “bibliomigrant” world of the early twentieth century (Levine & Mani, 2013; Mani, 2016) and therefore the proliferation of texts available to revolutionary thinkers, this article shifts the focus away from the postcolonial hagiographic concerns that Bhagat Singh read only “properly political” texts. 35 On the contrary, he read fiction (Elam, 2016; Yadav, 2007) and went to the movies with and without regard for their “convertability to politics.” The global circulation of texts and the proliferation of their interpretations and viewing experiences produced an altogether different canon of “revolutionary thought” available to cosmopolitan anticolonial thinkers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, these modes of reading offer us a tangled web of new interpretations of Bhagat Singh’s revolutionary thought, which was rooted in contagious affect, aesthetic pleasure, and political assuredness, rather than simply the final option. By highlighting the “bibliomigrant” world of the early twentieth century (Levine & Mani, 2013; Mani, 2016) and therefore the proliferation of texts available to revolutionary thinkers, this article shifts the focus away from the postcolonial hagiographic concerns that Bhagat Singh read only “properly political” texts. 35 On the contrary, he read fiction (Elam, 2016; Yadav, 2007) and went to the movies with and without regard for their “convertability to politics.” The global circulation of texts and the proliferation of their interpretations and viewing experiences produced an altogether different canon of “revolutionary thought” available to cosmopolitan anticolonial thinkers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goethe’s speculations on Weltliteratur were made possible by new translations of texts from imperial contact zones in the East (such as China, Persia, and India). B. Venkat Mani and Caroline Levine locate the ‘second flashpoint’ for world literature in the circulation of ‘great books’ in cheap print formats before the First World War (Levine and Mani, 2013: 143). In cultural and aesthetic terms, it was modernism, in its global formations and dispersed sites, that promoted a new curiosity about world art and literature from the beginning of the century to the interwar years and beyond.…”
Section: World Literature and The Global Modernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If "world literature" is conceived as an "interactive space" that involves the contribution of both authors and readers [95], Wattpad is the ideal context where to carry out an analysis of the most recent evolution of world literature. While globalization is gradually disrupting the closed canons of traditional literary criticism [96], recent studies have demonstrated how, in wide collaborative projects such as Wikipedia, the conception of world literature has already changed significantly [97].…”
Section: Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%