What controls tropical forest architecture? Testing environmental, structural and floristic drivers

Abstract

Aim To test the extent to which the vertical structure of tropical forests is determined by environment, forest structure or biogeographical history. Location Pan‐tropical. Methods Using height and diameter data from 20,497 trees in 112 non‐contiguous plots, asymptotic maximum height (H AM) and height–diameter relationships were computed with nonlinear mixed effects (NLME) models to: (1) test for environmental and structural causes of differences among plots, and (2) test if there were continental differences once environment and structure were accounted for; persistence of differences may imply the importance of biogeography for vertical forest structure. NLME analyses for floristic subsets of data (only/excluding Fabaceae and only/excluding Dipterocarpaceae individuals) were used to examine whether family‐level patterns revealed biogeographical explanations of cross‐continental differences. Results H AM and allometry were significantly different amongst continents. H AM was greatest in Asian forests (58.3 ± 7.5 m, 95% CI), followed by forests in Africa (45.1 ± 2.6 m), America (35.8 ± 6.0 m) and Australia (35.0 ± 7.4 m), and height–diameter relationships varied similarly; for a given diameter, stems were tallest in Asia, followed by Africa, America and Australia. Precipitation seasonality, basal area, stem density, solar radiation and wood density each explained some variation in allometry and H AM yet continental differences persisted even after these were accounted for. Analyses using floristic subsets showed that significant continental differences in H AM and allometry persisted in all cases. Main conclusions Tree allometry and maximum height are altered by environmental conditions, forest structure and wood density. Yet, even after accounting for these, tropical forest architecture varies significantly from continent to continent. The greater stature of tropical forests in Asia is not directly determined by the dominance of the family Dipterocarpaceae, as on average non‐dipterocarps are equally tall. We hypothesise that dominant large‐statured families create conditions in which only tall species can compete, thus perpetuating a forest dominated by tall individuals from diverse families.

Allometric Models for Estimating Tree Volume and Aboveground Biomass in Lowland Forests of Tanzania

“…This may be due to the fact that Mugasha et al [18] did not include trees found in areas with similar climate conditions as that of Rondo or Dindili in their model. Studies have shown that ht-dbh relationship varies significantly with climate [12,36]. Since climate variation affects ht, this in turn affects trees AGB and volume.…”

Abiotic Controls on Macroscale Variations of Humid Tropical Forest Height

“…These patterns, however, may not directly translate to variations of forest above ground biomass (AGB) as diameter and wood density of trees also control the forest AGB and influence the landscape heterogeneity [22,23]. Over sharp gradients such as tropical montane forests, tree height decreases with the rising elevation as proxy for decreasing temperature [24], present a combined effect of both climatic factors and edaphic properties.…”

Reducing the error in biomass estimates strongly depends on model selection

“…Estimating forest carbon stocks in an accurate, precise and verifiable way is a current challenge for forest-based projects to attenuate greenhouse gas emissions, such as REDD+ projects (Angelsen et al 2012). Estimating forest carbon stocks from the plot to the national level involves a combination of techniques, from field measurement to remote sensing, that are mutually dependent (Gibbs et al 2007).…”