2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What caused the GeV flare of PSR B1259-63?

Abstract: Context. PSR B1259-63 is a gamma-ray binary system composed of a high spindown pulsar and a massive star. Non-thermal emission up to TeV energies is observed near periastron passage, attributed to emission from high energy e + e − pairs accelerated at the shock with the circumstellar material from the companion star, resulting in a small-scale pulsar wind nebula. Weak gamma-ray emission was detected by the Fermi/LAT at the last periastron passage, unexpectedly followed 30 days later by a strong flare, limited … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a possibility was discussed by Pétri & Dubus (2011) and Dubus & Cerutti (2013). In Pétri & Dubus (2011) GeV emission is generated rather close to the pulsar, and the X-ray photons are scattered by the relativisitic pairs in the striped pulsar wind.…”
Section: Possible Connection Of the Be Star Disk Perturbation Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a possibility was discussed by Pétri & Dubus (2011) and Dubus & Cerutti (2013). In Pétri & Dubus (2011) GeV emission is generated rather close to the pulsar, and the X-ray photons are scattered by the relativisitic pairs in the striped pulsar wind.…”
Section: Possible Connection Of the Be Star Disk Perturbation Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the GeV flare was interpreted by the authors as a lucky combination of the geometry and a presence of additional seed photons coming from the shocked region. In the Dubus & Cerutti (2013) model the GeV emission is due to the IC scattering of the X-ray photons by the schocked relativistic wind. In this model the GeV flare is expected to peak near the inferior conjunction, but the reason of the delay between the X-ray and GeV peak in this model is not clear.…”
Section: Possible Connection Of the Be Star Disk Perturbation Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flare is about 10-times brighter than the predicted emission at periastron, which represents a gamma-ray luminosity comparable to the pulsar spin-down power. A radiative efficiency close to 100% is in principle achievable with inverse Compton scattering, but the density of stellar photons is far too low to explain the flux at these phases, unless there are extra sources of radiation close to the pulsar (see, e.g., Dubus and Cerutti 2013), or significant Doppler boosting of the emission towards the observer (Dubus et al 2010;Kong et al 2012). The flare peaks at 300 MeV and is seen only in the GeV band, which suggests that the particle energy distribution must be very narrow.…”
Section: Comparison With Gev Flares In the Psr B1259-63/ls 2883 Binarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This terminal shock model has explained the periodic light curve of the non-thermal X-ray emission very well; see, e.g., Takata et al (2012). In a previous modeling work on the GeV flare, Khangulyan et al (2012) used the IC scattering of the unshocked PW off soft photons from the Be star, while Dubus & Cerutti (2013) brought up an IC model using the X-ray synchrotron radiation from the shock as the IC target photons. Kong et al (2012) used the synchrotron model with relativistic flows beaming toward Earth along the bow shock tails.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%