2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10173925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Can We Learn from the Past by Means of Very Long-Term Follow-Up after Aortic Valve Replacement?

Abstract: Background: Studies on very long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement are sparse. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, long-term outcomes during 25.1 ± 2.8 years of follow-up were determined in 673 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery for severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation. Independent predictors of decreased long-term survival were determined. Cumulative incidence rates of major adverse events in patients with a mec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some authors found PPM to be associated with adverse early and/or late outcome, others did not find any negative influence [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. In addition, PPM may also preclude regression of left ventricular hypertrophy [13,14].…”
Section: Prosthesis-patient Mismatch and Early And Late Outcome After...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While some authors found PPM to be associated with adverse early and/or late outcome, others did not find any negative influence [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. In addition, PPM may also preclude regression of left ventricular hypertrophy [13,14].…”
Section: Prosthesis-patient Mismatch and Early And Late Outcome After...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPM is not an uncommon finding following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), as it is described in up to 20-30% of the cases in series following surgical but also transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%