What Can We Conclude about the Real Aspect Ratios of Ice Particle Aggregates from Two-Dimensional Images?

Abstract

A simple numerical experiment was performed to investigate the result published in many papers that measurements indicate that aggregates may be well represented as oblate spheroids with mean aspect ratio (semiminor axis to semimajor axis length) of 0.6. The aspect ratio measurements are derived from two-dimensional projections of complex three-dimensional aggregates. Here, aggregates were modeled as ellipsoids with semiprincipal axes of length a, b, and c, which include oblate spheroids (a = b) as a class, and the projected aspect ratios of large numbers of two-dimensional projections of them were sampled. When sampling oblate spheroids with aspect ratio 0.6 over random orientations, the mean projected aspect ratio is 0.746. A mean projected aspect ratio of 0.6 is obtained for an oblate spheroid with aspect ratio of 0.33. When sampling randomly oriented ellipsoids with semiminor axes (b, c) varying from 0.10 to 1.00 in steps of 0.01, representing many complex shapes, the mean projected aspect ratio is 0.595, close to the measured mean projected aspect ratio of aggregates of 0.6. These experiments demonstrate that the conclusion one may safely draw from the projected aspect ratio measurements is that the mean aspect ratio of aggregates is lower than 0.6. Moreover, the projected aspect ratio distributions from measurements suggest a mixture of aggregate shapes, rather than only oblate spheroids as is often assumed.

Toward Exploring the Synergy Between Cloud Radar Polarimetry and Doppler Spectral Analysis in Deep Cold Precipitating Systems in the Arctic

“…Large and more isotropic particles, such as irregular or aggregated ice usually produce low Z DR because of their low density and relatively high aspect ratio. The aspect ratios of aggregates generally vary between 0.5 and 0.7 (Hogan et al, ; Korolev & Isaac, ) and can be smaller than 0.6 (Jiang et al, ). These quasi‐isotropic ice particles, having aspect ratios less than 1, can produce tangible K DP if their concentration is sufficiently high.…”

A Versatile Method for Ice Particle Habit Classification Using Airborne Imaging Probe Data

“…Note that in this case the axes were not renormalized as AR values are naturally bounded and can be easily interpreted or compared to other studies. In the literature, different definitions of AR have been used (e.g., D 90 / D max in Korolev & Isaac, ; Hogan et al, ; ellipse fit based AR in Garrett et al, ; Jiang et al, ) and comparisons between those could be problematic if the obtained values are significantly different. In the present case, we clearly see that even on rather simple shapes like columnar crystals, the use of different AR definitions leads to different values.…”

How Does Riming Affect Dual‐Polarization Radar Observations and Snowflake Shape?

“…Though it is possible to adjust σ θ to 0°to pull the averaged AR to be closer to 0.6, this is obviously unrealistic. As demonstrated in theoretical simulation by Jiang et al (2017) and in observational study by Matrosov et al (2017), the retrieved AR using single video camera can be overestimated. Therefore, the commonly adopted AR parameterization of 0.6 needs to be used more carefully.…”