2016
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtw083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What can natural edges of gallery forests teach us about woody community performance in sharp ecotones?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we did not find higher abundances of co‐occurring tree species between habitats, the differences in tree size are most likely to underlie edge effects on AGB. de Oliveira Coelho (2016), in the same sites, showed a sharp reduction in specific tree sizes even for conspecific tree stems only 10 m apart from the immediate forest edge toward the forest interior. Two non‐exclusive hypotheses can explain smaller trees in edges as compared to interiors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As we did not find higher abundances of co‐occurring tree species between habitats, the differences in tree size are most likely to underlie edge effects on AGB. de Oliveira Coelho (2016), in the same sites, showed a sharp reduction in specific tree sizes even for conspecific tree stems only 10 m apart from the immediate forest edge toward the forest interior. Two non‐exclusive hypotheses can explain smaller trees in edges as compared to interiors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Lastly, we ran a paired Student's t test to test the hypothesis that the DBH, height, and abundance of shared species differ between edges and interiors (sampling units were the species averages in each site). We used the vegan package to perform the PERMANOVA (Oksanen et al, 2017), the lme4 package to fit mixedeffect models (Bates et al, 2015), the priceTools package to compute CAFE components (Kremer, 2020), and the agricolae package to run ANOVA and post-hoc tests (de Mendiburu, 2017). We performed all analyses in the R environment (R Core Team, 2017), and the full data are made available in Appendix S4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations