2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cliser.2018.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What can climate services learn from theory and practice of co-production?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There appears to be potential to open dialogue that would improve flood information services through the involvement of the private sector. These suggestions accord with recent calls for co-production as a route to improving the relevance of climate services [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…There appears to be potential to open dialogue that would improve flood information services through the involvement of the private sector. These suggestions accord with recent calls for co-production as a route to improving the relevance of climate services [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Fortunately, the international research community is mobilized in ongoing observational and modeling efforts (Dinku et al, 2017;FCFA, 2017;GFDRR, 2015;James et al, 2018;Washington et al, 2012) that have the potential to close our knowledge gaps and further reduce uncertainties in projections. In the meantime, new approaches for the co-production of climate knowledge by scientists and users are coming into focus (Bhave, Conway, & Dessai, 2018;Haasnoot, van t Klooster, & van Alphen, 2018;Kalra et al, 2014;Shepherd et al, 2018;Vincent, Daly, Scannell, & Leathes, 2018) and promise a way forward in planning for adaptation under deep uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early climate service design principles at these different scales were developed by the GFCS through a series of exemplars and consultative strategic documents (Hewitt et al 2012) informed by earlier work (e.g., NRC 2001, among others). More recent research has reinforced many of the earlier conclusions on building capacity, particularly within NMHSs to transform them into national climate service centers (such as Mahon et al 2019), the benefits of coproducing user-oriented climate information (Vincent et al 2018), opportunities and challenges associated with commercializing climate services (Webber and Donner 2017), and the role of different actors and different approaches in the design of climate services (Christel et al 2018).…”
Section: Examples Of Gfcs Success At the Regional Scalementioning
confidence: 87%